High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Appeals Filed Against Single Judge Order in Land Acquisition Matters Involving KIADB. Appeals Challenge Order Dated 04.07.2025 in Various Writ Petitions Filed by Landowners and Developers.
29 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "award quashing"
1022 result(s) found
Found 1022 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Award of Contract to Successful Bidder in Tender Dispute, Setting Aside High Court's Interference. Judicial Review in Tender Matters is Limited to Examining Arbitrariness and Procedural Fairness, Not Re-evaluating Merits, Especially After Contract Execution Under the Tender Terms.
25 Mar 2026The dispute arose from a tender floated by Respondent for operation and maintenance of a gas-based power plant. The tender used a Quality and Cost Bas...
- 977
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Execution Court Order in Land Acquisition Dispute — Defense Estate Officer Succeeds in Setting Aside Ex-Parte Order Due to Lack of Notice. The Court held that the execution court failed to issue notice to the judgment debtor before proceeding with execution, violating principles of natural justice under Order XXI Rule 22 CPC.
20 Aug 2025The petitioner, The Defense Estate Officer, Karnataka and Goa Circle, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India se...
- 44
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Reverses High Court in SICA Case on Unsecured Creditor Rights - Sanctioned Rehabilitation Scheme Binding on All Creditors. Court held that under Sections 18(8) and 32 of Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985, unsecured creditors cannot opt out of scaled-down payments and must accept scheme terms for company revival.
17 Mar 2023The Supreme Court addressed a group of appeals concerning the binding effect of rehabilitation schemes sanctioned under the Sick Industrial Companies ...
- 278
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Reinstates Arbitral Award and Dismisses High Court's Interference in Arbitration Appeal. High Court Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Re-appreciating Evidence and Entering into Merits of Claim, Contrary to Limited Scope of Appellate Review.
11 Jan 2022The dispute originated from a contract between Haryana Tourism Limited (Corporation) and a respondent company for supply of aerated cold drinks at tou...
- 214
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Upholds Dismissal of Bank Clerk for Misappropriation of Funds — Industrial Tribunal's Award Rejecting Reference Upheld. Petitioner's challenge to dismissal and denial of back wages fails as domestic enquiry found fair and proper, and punishment proportionate under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
21 Nov 2016The petitioner, H.G. Hiremani, was a workman employed as a clerk with Canara Bank (respondent) since 3.1.1977. He was dismissed from service on 17.8.1...
- 55
High Court
- 50
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Defence Estate Officer in Arbitration Delay Case — Section 14 of Limitation Act Applicable to Section 34 Applications. The court held that time spent in pursuing remedy before wrong forum is liable to be excluded under Section 14, and the delay of few days in filing application under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was condonable.
20 Aug 2013The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by the Defence Estate Officer, Mumbai Circle, against the judgment of a Single Judge of the Bombay Hig...
- 117
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Cooperative Bank Dispute — Upholds Tribunal's Finding That Petitioner Was Not Entitled to Be Heard Before Enquiry Report Was Tabled. The court held that the principles of natural justice were not violated as the petitioner was given an opportunity to respond after the report was placed before the Board.
5 Feb 2013The petitioner, Nazim H. Kazi, was a member of the respondent, Kokan Mercantile Cooperative Bank Ltd., since 1986 and served as its Chairman from 25th...
- 56
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Tender Cancellation for Canteen at Ravindra Bhavan — No Right to Claim Continuation of Contract After Expiry of Term. The court held that no vested right accrues until contract is awarded, and cancellation of tender for public interest is not arbitrary under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.
23 Jan 2013The petitioner, Jude E. Pereira, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a mandamus to direct the respon...
- 55
