Search Results for "accomplice evidence"

224 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 224 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Sexual Assault Under Sections 4 & 10 of POCSO Act and Section 376(2) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Royston Xavier Parera, was convicted by the Special Judge under the POCSO Act for offences under Sections 4 & 10 of the POCSO Act and S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Kashinath Shiru Ahire, was a maintenance surveyor in the Land Record office at Sindkheda, District Dhule. He was convicted by the Speci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 302, 201, 294 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 10th August 2007 passed by the learned Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge-6, Nagpu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Laboratory Assistant for Rape of Minor Student — Victim's Testimony and Medical Evidence Sufficient. Conviction under Sections 376, 342, 506(2) IPC for Rape of 12-Year-Old in School Laboratory Upheld.

The appellant, Kailash Kisan Memjade, was a Laboratory Assistant at Saint Hildas High School, Pune. On 23 February 2011, he called a 12-year-old stude...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inherent Improbability and False Implication — Conviction Under Section 376 IPC Set Aside on Grounds of Preponderance of Probabilities.

The appellant, Rajesh s/o Kewalramji Chute, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Bhandara, for offences under Section 376 IPC (rape) and Section 506 I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Gajanan s/o Lobhaji Dahale, was convicted by the Special Judge, Pusad, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Rationing Officer in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 7 and Section 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole interested witness testimony insufficient.

The appellant, Pandharinath Shelke, was a Rationing Officer at the Rationing Office, Kurla. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Greater Bombay in S...