Search Results for "Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act"

468 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 468 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Act Case Due to Procedural Non-Compliance in Private Vehicle Search. Conviction Quashed as Search Governed by Section 42, Not Section 43, of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, with Mandatory Requirements Not Met.

The appeal arose from a conviction under Section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, where the appellants were found with ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in NDPS Act Case Due to Contradictory Evidence and Non-Production of Contraband. Benefit of Doubt Granted as Prosecution Failed to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant was convicted under Section 18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) for possession of 6 kg 300 g of op...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction in NDPS Case for Possession of 4.5 kg Ganja — Ten Years' Rigorous Imposition Confirmed. Appeal Dismissed as Prosecution Proved Conscious Possession and Compliance with Section 50 of NDPS Act, 1985.

The appellant, Ishwar Buddha, was convicted by the Special Judge, NDPS Court, South Goa, for an offence under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic Dru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Insufficient Evidence — Confession of Co-Accused and Retracted Confession Without Corroboration Cannot Sustain Conviction for Financing Illicit Traffic Under Section 27A NDPS Act

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Mohammed Fasrin, who was convicted under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 42(2) of NDPS Act. Secret Information Not Sent to Superior Officer Renders Search Illegal and Conviction Unsustainable.

The appellant, Majjidkha s/o Hanifkha Khan, was convicted by the Special Judge, Chandrapur in Special Case No.10/2004 for an offence punishable under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Act Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 42. Failure to Record Information and Forward Report to Superior Officer Renders Search Illegal.

The appellant, Dnyandeo s/o Atmaram Aswar, was convicted by the 1st Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Akola, in Sessions Trial No. 8/2002 for an offenc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Due to Lack of Conscious Possession and Long Incarceration. The court held that mere partnership in a firm does not establish conscious possession of contraband under Section 43 of NDPS Act, and long custody without trial warrants bail.

The petitioner, Chandru Kunthur Raghuvegowda, a partner of M/s. Overseas Express, filed a petition under Section 439 CrPC seeking bail in Crime No.893...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Release of Vehicle Seized in NDPS Case to Owner on Supurdnama — Vehicle Not Liable to Confiscation Without Conviction. The Court held that the NDPS Act does not bar release of a vehicle pending trial, and the Sessions Court erred in rejecting the application for interim custody.

The petitioner, Anil Navnath Marathe, was the owner of a Mahindra Max Jeep bearing registration No. MH-12-EF-5860. He was also accused no. 2 in NDPS (...