Search Results for "Land encroachment"

776 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 776 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Contempt Petition in Encroachment Dispute After Survey Reveals Patta Land. Revenue Authorities Have No Power to Evict Under Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 for Private Land; Civil Remedy Available.

The petitioner filed a contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging wilful disobedience of an order dated 27.06.20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Over Encroachment — High Court's Modification of Trial Decree Set Aside. The Court held that the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction under Section 100 CPC by modifying a concurrent finding of encroachment without framing a substantial question of law.

The appellants, legal heirs of the original plaintiff Om Parkash, filed Civil Suit No.426 of 1996 seeking mandatory injunction for removal of an alleg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 890 OF 2025

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Specific Performance Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Readiness and Willingness. Agreement to Sell for Agricultural Land Held Valid and Enforceable Despite Non-Registration of Power of Attorney.

The case involves two second appeals arising from a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell agricultural land. The plaintiff, Hiren Veni...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Service Matter — Appellant Institution Succeeds in Proving Lack of Employer-Employee Relationship. The respondent failed to establish his employment with the appellant, leading to dismissal of the suit for declaration and injunction.

The appellant, The Chairman The State Government Employees Shikshana Sangha, Laxmi Complex, Neeligin Road, Hubli, represented by its Principal, filed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Hawking Activities on Footpaths in Nariman Point and Churchgate Areas. Court Holds That Hawking Is a Fundamental Right Under Article 19(1)(g) Subject to Reasonable Restrictions, and That Municipal Authorities Have Discretion to Designate Hawking Zones.

The petitioners, a group of residents and welfare associations from Nariman Point and Churchgate areas in Mumbai, filed a Public Interest Litigation (...