Search Results for "Income Tax Act 1922"

280 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 280 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Pre-deposit Condition Under Punjab VAT Act. Condition of 25% Pre-deposit for First Appeal Held Not Unconstitutional, but Appellate Authority Has Inherent Power to Grant Interim Relief.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals challenging the judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court which upheld the validity of Section 62(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows State's Writ Petition in Sales Tax Appeal Maintainability Case — Right of Appeal Under Section 55(1)(c) of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 Includes State Government. The State is a 'person aggrieved' by a Commissioner's determination under Section 52 and can appeal to the Tribunal.

The State of Maharashtra filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the decision of the Sales Tax Tribunal dated 30 June ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement Order of IRS Officer Due to Bias and Malice. Compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of Fundamental Rules, 1922, set aside as it was punitive, violated natural justice due to biased committee members, and disregarded clean service record.

The dispute involved an Indian Revenue Service officer challenging his compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of the Fundamental Rules, ordered three ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Customs Reference Application for Non-Compliance with Time Limit Under Section 130A(4) of Customs Act, 1962. CESTAT's failure to submit statement of case within 120 days renders reference time-barred, leading to discharge of bank guarantee.

The petitioners, Asit C. Mehta Financial Services Limited and Asit C. Mehta, filed a writ petition seeking dismissal of Customs Application No. 28 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Excise Duty on Rubber Users Under the Rubber Act, 1947. Levy Valid as Excise Duty on Production Can Be Collected from Users and Act Contains Sufficient Policy Guidance Against Excessive Delegation.

The case involved a challenge by Jullundur Rubber Goods Manufacturers’ Association, an association of rubber chappal manufacturers in Jullundur, Pun...