Search Results for "IPC Section 366"

366 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 366 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Considers Death Reference and Appeals Against Conviction and Death Sentence for Gang Rape and Murder. Trial Court Found Accused Guilty Under Sections 302, 201, 366, 376(d) IPC and Imposed Death Penalty Based on Circumstantial Evidence Including DNA and Eyewitness Accounts.

The case arises out of the judgment and order dated 29 April 2022 passed by the Sessions Court, Kapadvanj, Kheda, in Sessions Case No. 12 of 2021, con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rejects Bail for Gang Rape Accused Despite 3-Year Incarceration, Citing Prima Facie Evidence and Seriousness of Offence Under Section 376(D) IPC. Speedy Trial Violation Claim Rejected as Charge Framed and Trial to Be Expedited.

The applicant, Nitesh Raghunath Lahange, filed a second bail application before the Bombay High Court seeking release in connection with Crime No. I-1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Prosecutrix in POCSO Case, Sets Aside Acquittal of Accused for Kidnapping and Rape of Minor. Court holds that consent of a minor is irrelevant and the victim's testimony is credible despite minor inconsistencies.

The case arises from an appeal filed by the prosecutrix (victim) under Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Acquits Appellant in Rape and Abetment of Suicide Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Conviction under Sections 366(A), 376, 306, 506 IPC set aside as dying declarations were contradictory and not corroborated by medical evidence.

The appellant, Madhukar Baswant Barora, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan on 3rd July 2012 for offences under Sections 366(A), 37...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in POCSO Case for Kidnapping and Rape of Minor — Victim's Consistent Testimony and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Prove Offences Under Sections 363, 366A, 376(2) IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act, 2012.

The appellant, Devanand Rajabhau More, was convicted by the Special Court, Ambajogai, in Special POCSO Case No. 4/2014 for offences under Sections 363...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellant, Zabarsingh Pilya Bhilala, was convicted by the IIIrd Ad hoc Assistant Sessions Judge, Achalpur in Sessions Trial 80/1997 for offences u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Age. Conviction under Sections 363 and 366 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Victim Was Below 18 Years and That Taking Was Without Consent.

The appellants, Rohidas Laxman Malge and Vilas Sopanrao Landge, were convicted by the trial court under Sections 363 and 366 read with Section 34 of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape and Kidnapping Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Consent. Conviction under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Lack of Consent and Age of Victim Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Govind Shripat Maraskolhe, was convicted by the Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha in Sessions Trial No. 56/2006 for offences und...