Search Results for "Hyderabad Civil Services Rules"

345 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 345 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Civil Revision Against Wakf Tribunal's Declaration of Mutawali and Permanent Injunction. Revision Applicant Contests Jurisdiction of Wakf Tribunal to Decide Mutawali Status Under Hyderabad Atiyat Inquiries Act, 1952.

Background: The dispute revolves around the management and control of a wakf property, Dargah Hazrat Mansoor Shah Wali in Beed. The plaintiff claimed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Awards in Information Technology Upgrade Contract Dispute. Petition Challenges Awards Granting Refund and Rejecting Counter Claims.

The petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was filed by CMC Limited (original respondent in the arbitration) impugnin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Road Widening Under Maharashtra Highways Act, 1955. Petitioners Failed to Show Statutory Violation or Arbitrariness in Acquisition Process.

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by landowners challenging the acquisition of their land for widening of the Aurangabad-Jalna road und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Wakf Tribunal Order Upholding Plaintiff's Title Over Wakf Property. The court held that the Wakf Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide the suit and that the plaintiff's suit was not barred by limitation.

The case involves a dispute over Survey Gut No.66 of village Harsool, Aurangabad. The plaintiff, Pratapsingh s/o Nursing Kakarwal, filed a suit before...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice in CENVAT Credit Case Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Non-supply of documents and denial of cross-examination vitiated the notice under Article 226 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Supermax Personal Care Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in manufacturing excisable goods such as safety razors, blades, and shaving system...