Search Results for "Ceiling area"

495 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 495 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Blue Zone Classification Not Proved by State. Market Value Determined at Rs. 100 per sq. ft. Based on Comparable Awards for Similar Lands Acquired for Same Purpose Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case pertains to the acquisition of land owned by the appellant, Kazi Akiloddin, for the construction of a flood protection wall in Akola, Maharas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Jurisdictional Limits on State Interference in Land Rights: State of West Bengal v. Jai Hind Pvt. Ltd., Civil Appeal No. 7407 of 2012

The case arose from a dispute involving land/tenancy rights and administrative interference by State authorities in West Bengal. The High Court had se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Airport Project Despite Procedural Lapses. Court Holds That Dispensation of Section 5A Inquiry Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Was Unjustified but Refuses to Quash Notification in Public Interest.

The two writ petitions were filed by M/s. Suretech Hospital & Research Centre Limited and M/s. Vighnaharta Builders and Developers challenging land ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation for Landowners in MSRTC Bus Depot Acquisition Relying on Prior Award. Market Value Determined Based on Prior Award in Identical Acquisition Proceedings Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involved three land acquisition references under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, filed by the landowners claiming enhanced comp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Competent Authority Order in MOFA Dispute — Failure to Provide Hearing Violates Natural Justice. Section 5A of MOFA Requires Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Before Directing Conveyance of Land to Society.

The petitioners, Mazda Construction Company, Maredia Enterprises, and Sultanabad CHS Ltd. (Proposed), challenged an order dated 11.04.2012 passed by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 835 OF 2022

...