Search Results for "tribunal’s findings"

4705 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4705 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

ARBITRATION PETITION NO.549 OF 2013

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Upholding Autonomy Amidst Settlement Disputes Exploring Legal Principles and Precedents in Arbitration Law

This Judgment pertains to a legal discussion surrounding arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, particularly focusing on the re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 5539 OF 2017

The petitioner, M/s. Veekaylal Investment Co. Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India in the Bombay High Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Partial Award on Existence of JEA. The petition challenges an arbitral tribunal's finding that an initialled but unsigned JEA was a valid contract containing an arbitration agreement under Section 7 of the Arbitration Act.

The petition arose out of a partial arbitral award dated January 9, 2014, passed under Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Scope of Section 45 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act in International Commercial Disputes. Multiple Issues Framed on Reference to Arbitration in Multi-Party Joint Venture Agreements.

The dispute arose from a series of joint venture and ancillary agreements executed between Indian company Chloro Controls (I) P. Ltd. and foreign coll...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Compensation Award in Motor Accident Case — Insurance Company Liable for Negligent Parking of Vehicle. Truck parked without indication on highway causing accident; insurer held jointly liable with owner for compensation under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on 13th March 2009, when the respondent no.1, a minor aged 10 years, was traveling in a Tata Magic...