Search Results for "tendering evidence"

459 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 459 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Arbitration Dispute Over Canal Construction Contract — Upholds Arbitrator's Award on Premium Rate at 93.12% for Extra Work, Remits Claim No.8 for Reconsideration, and Restores Interest at 12% Per Annum

The dispute arose from a contract dated 05.02.1985 between Chandigarh Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd. (claimant) and the State of Punjab (opposite party) f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Confirms Death Sentence for Four Accused in Dacoity and Murder Case — Conviction Under Sections 396, 397, 302 IPC Upheld. Court Finds Circumstantial Evidence Sufficient to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to a dacoity and murder that occurred on the night of 14th February 2009. The prosecution alleged that the four accused, Basavaraj @...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Corruption Case Due to Failed Trap and Lack of Demand Proof. Conviction under Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as initial demand was not corroborated and trap failed.

The case involves an appeal against conviction under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellants, clerks at Pune Municipal Cor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Corruption Case Due to Failed Trap and Lack of Demand Proof. Conviction under Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as initial demand was not corroborated and trap did not succeed.

The case involves an appeal against conviction under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellants, clerks at Pune Municipal Cor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit Challenging Income Tax Order for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 269UN of Income Tax Act, 1961. Jurisdiction of Civil Court Barred as Appropriate Authority's Order Under Chapter XXC Is Final and Conclusive.

The plaintiff, Sasmita Investments Ltd., filed a suit in the Bombay High Court challenging an order passed by the Appropriate Authority under Chapter ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Gram Panchayat Election Process for Non-Compliance with Pre-Election Deposit Requirement. Petitioners failed to deposit required amount under Rule 7(2) of Maharashtra Gram Panchayat (Election) Rules, 2014, leading to rejection of nomination papers.

The petitioners, residents of Khuneshwar village in Solapur district, filed two writ petitions challenging the election process for the Gram Panchayat...