Search Results for "teacher employment"

562 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 562 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Compassionate Pension Claim of Removed Teacher Under Rule 101 of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982. Distinction Between Removal and Dismissal Determines Eligibility for Compassionate Pension.

The petitioner, Nalini Shende, was appointed as a temporary teacher at Smt. Jankidevi Jaiswal Prathmik Vidyalaya, Nagpur, and was granted permanency f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petition Challenging School Tribunal Order for Payment of Six Months' Salary to Temporary Teacher. Termination of Temporary Teacher Upheld as Not Illegal, but Compensation Granted Under Section 11(2)(e) of MEPS Act for Non-Compliance with Section 5.

The petitioner, Rajashree Shikshan Sanstha, a school management, challenged the judgment dated 13.12.2016 of the School Tribunal, Nagpur, in Appeal No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds School Tribunal's Order Reinstating Teacher with Back-Wages in MEPS Act Case — Continuous Service as Shikshan Sevak Confers Permanency Despite Annual Termination Letters.

The petitioners, the Chairman of Bhor Education Society and the Head Master of Raja Raghunathrao Vidyalaya, challenged the order of the School Tribuna...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Termination of Temporary Employee for Fraudulent Appointment. Appointment obtained by suppressing material facts and producing forged documents is void ab initio, and the employee is not entitled to reinstatement or back wages.

The case involves three writ petitions arising from a dispute over the appointment of a teacher in a private aided school. The first petition was file...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Minority Scholarship Schemes as Constitutional — Schemes for Minority Communities Do Not Violate Article 14 or 15(1) as They Are Based on Backwardness and Not Religion Alone.

The Bombay High Court disposed of two public interest litigations challenging the constitutional validity of two scholarship schemes for minority comm...