Search Results for "section 23(3)"

850 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 850 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Constitutionality of Prohibitory Orders Under Section 144 CrPC Restricting Public Assembly. Judgment Clarifies That Reasonable Restrictions on Speech and Assembly Must Be Just, Fair and Reasonable Under Articles 19 and 21.

The Supreme Court initiated a suo motu criminal writ petition regarding the incident at Ramlila Maidan on 4-5 June 2011, involving the imposition of p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Passes Order in Writ Petition by Company Challenging Rejection of Application Under Industrial Park Scheme, 2002. Petitioner's Application Dated 15.12.2006 Under IPS 2002 Was Rejected on Ground That Scheme Expired on 31.03.2006.

The petitioner, a private limited company, proposed to set up an industrial park named 'Salarpuria Touch Stone' in Bangalore under a Joint Development...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice for Lack of Jurisdiction and Limitation — Income Tax Act, 1961 Sections 147, 148, 148A, 149, 151. Reassessment notice issued beyond limitation period and without fresh information under Explanation 1 to Section 148 is invalid.

The petitioner, Godrej Industries Ltd., challenged a show cause notice dated 24th May 2022 under Section 148A(b), an order dated 31st July 2022 under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Challenging Wakf Board Notification Including Service Inam Lands in Dargah Property. Errata Notification Adding Lands to Wakf Property Upheld as Valid Exercise of Power Under Wakf Act, 1995.

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of civil appeals challenging an order of the Andhra Pradesh High Court that upheld an Errata Notification issued b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Draft Development Plan and Extension Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. General Body Resolution Modifying Draft Plan Upheld as Legislative Function; Ex Post Facto Extension Held Permissible.

This judgment arose from writ petitions filed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court challenging the notification dated 4 February 2016 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

(1) WRIT PETITION NO.4168 OF 2012

...