KAHC010366622012_1
21 Jun 2016...
Search Results for "school property"
1593 result(s) found
Found 1593 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Demolition of Structure Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 — Held That Demolition Without Prior Notice Under Section 53(1) Is Illegal. The Court directed restoration of the demolished structure and compensation for loss caused by the illegal demolition.
21 Mar 2018The petitioners, Anil Banarasidas Jindal (since deceased, through legal heirs) and Narayan Appasaheb Chalge, filed a writ petition challenging the dem...
- 124
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Application for Appointment of Receiver in Partition Suit. Notice of Motion Seeks Interim Relief for Joint Family Properties Allegedly Misappropriated by Co-Owners.
27 Aug 2013The plaintiff filed a suit for declaration that he is entitled to a 1/10th share in the assets and properties of the joint family and for partition by...
- 20
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Road Widening Under Maharashtra Highways Act, 1955. Petitioners' Challenge to Section 6(1) Notification Fails Due to Delay, Laches, and Existence of Alternative Remedy.
2 Aug 2023The petitioners, who are residents and agriculturists of Mahalunge, Taluka-Mulshi, District Pune, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Const...
- 57
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in POCSO Case — Conviction Set Aside Due to Procedural Irregularities in Treating Juvenile as Adult and Lack of Corroboration. The Court held that the Special Court failed to follow the mandatory procedure under the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 before trying the appellant as an adult, and the evidence of the child victim was insufficient to prove the offence beyond reasonable doubt.
25 Jan 2021The appellant, a 17-year-old boy at the time of the alleged offence, was convicted by the Special Court under the POCSO Act and IPC for attempting to ...
- 58
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Public View. Land Dispute and Caste-Based Allegations Fail to Sustain Conviction Under SC & ST Act
14 Oct 2025Criminal Law-- Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 363, 366, 506 and 376-- Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012(POCSO)- Section 4-- The...
- 1640
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Case — Court Receiver Appointed to Protect Suit Premises Pending Trial. Dispute Involves Alleged Illegal Dispossession of Widow and Minor Son from Residential Flat and Office Premises by In-Laws.
9 Oct 2012The appeal arises from a suit filed by Khushnuma Ibrahim Khan and her minor son Raghib Ibrahim Khan (appellants) against Asadullah Khan and others (re...
- 83
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Cheating Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute. Dispute over loan repayment and property transfer held to be predominantly civil, not criminal, warranting quashing under Section 482 CrPC.
16 Aug 2017The applicants, Santosh Adinath Ghalage and Vidya Santosh Ghalage, were accused in Crime No.14 of 2017 registered at Ajintha Police Station, Aurangaba...
- 97
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Title Dispute Against Government — Holds That Government Cannot Unilaterally Resume Land Without Following Due Process and Payment of Compensation. Court Restores Trial Court Decree Declaring Appellants' Title Based on Valid Sale Deed and Pattadar Passbook, Setting Aside High Court's Reversal.
24 Mar 2025The case involves a dispute over 3.34 acres of land in Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh. The appellants claimed title through a chain of transactions ...
- 375
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Aggravated Sexual Assault of Minor — Child Victim's Testimony Found Credible Despite Minor Inconsistencies. The court held that the spontaneous statement of the three-and-a-half-year-old victim to her mother immediately after the incident is admissible as res gestae under Section 6 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, and the conviction under Section 376(2)(i) IPC, Section 8(2) of the Goa Children's Act, 2003, and Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 was sustainable.
11 Oct 2019The appellant, Khalil Kureshi, was convicted by the Children's Court, Panaji, Goa for offences under Section 376(2)(i) IPC, Section 8(2) of the Goa Ch...
- 117
