Search Results for "railway ticket"

307 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 307 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Case — Death Due to Accidental Fall from Train Constitutes Untoward Incident Under Railways Act, 1989. Widow and Children Entitled to Compensation as Deceased Was a Bona Fide Passenger and Fall Was Accidental, Not Self-Inflicted.

The case involves an appeal by the widow, children, and mother of Sanjay Awachare (deceased) against the dismissal of their claim petition by the Rail...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Case — Deceased's Fall While Alighting Train at Non-Stoppage Station Held to be Untoward Incident Under Section 123(c) of Railways Act, 1989. Negligence of Deceased Not a Defense Under Section 124A; Legal Heirs Entitled to Compensation.

The appeal arises from the rejection of a claim petition by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, in Case No. OA(IIu)NGP/2013/0331. The deceased, Arjun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Deemed Accidental Fall Not Suicide. Death of a passenger falling from a train and being run over is an 'untoward incident' under Section 123(c) of the Railways Act, 1989, and the railway is liable for compensation under Section 124-A.

The present appeal was filed by the appellants, Ramesh Laxmanrao Dighade and Mrs. Sindhu w/o Ramesh Dighade, being aggrieved by the judgment and award...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Sets Aside Tribunal's Dismissal for Non-Prosecution. Held that the Tribunal erred in dismissing the claim application for default without considering the merits, and the matter must be restored for fresh adjudication.

The appellant, Mohd. Saber s/o Mohd. Illyas, filed a claim application before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur Bench, seeking compensation for inju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Deceased's Own Negligence Not a Bar to Compensation Under Railways Act, 1989. Held that 'untoward incident' includes accidental falls from trains regardless of passenger negligence, relying on Jameela v. Union of India.

The appellants, parents of the deceased Firdaus Kausar, filed a claim before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, after their daughter died on 4.2.201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Counterfeit Currency Offences Under IPC Sections 489-B and 489-C Read with 120-B. Appellant's conviction for using and possessing counterfeit currency notes as part of a conspiracy is confirmed, with sentence reduced to already undergone period.

The appellant, Javed Abdul Aziz Shaikh, was convicted by the trial court for offences punishable under Section 489-B read with 120-B and Section 489-C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Parents' Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Falling from Crowded Train is Untoward Incident Under Section 123(c)(2) of Railways Act, 1989. Parents Held to be Dependants Entitled to Compensation Despite Lack of Documentary Proof.

The appellants, parents of the deceased Alpesh Arun Dhotre, filed a claim for compensation before the Railway Claims Tribunal after their son died whi...