CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 661 OF 2005
12 Apr 2013The case arose from Special Case No. 10 of 2001 before the III Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad, where eight accused faced trial on charges of kidnap...
Search Results for "muddemal"
888 result(s) found
Found 888 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction in NDPS Act Case for Possession of 2.225 kg Charas. Mandatory compliance with Section 50 of NDPS Act not triggered as recovery was from bag, not person.
10 Jun 2019The appellant, Krishna S/o Kavi Raj Malla, was convicted by the Special Judge of Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Court, Mapusa, for the offen...
- 177
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Seven Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 148, 447, 302 read with 149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
24 Jun 2016The case involves an appeal by seven accused persons convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pusad in Session Trial No.19 of 2011 for offences und...
- 62
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Child Witness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness account of 12-year-old daughter found inconsistent and lacking corroboration.
26 Sep 2022The appellant, Shankar Shrirang Gulik, was convicted by the Trial Court under Section 302 IPC for the murder of Chhaya Shinde and sentenced to life im...
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction Under Sections 302, 201, 364 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Motive, Last Seen, and Recovery Beyond Reasonable Doubt.
22 Aug 2023The case pertains to the murder of Satyawan, who was allegedly abducted and killed by the appellants due to a debt dispute. The prosecution's case was...
- 23
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Tiger Skin Trafficking Under Wildlife Protection Act — Conspiracy to Trade in Tiger Skin and Wild Animal Products Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Section 120-B IPC read with Sections 49, 49-B and 51 of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 confirmed based on credible evidence of seizure and conspiracy.
6 Jun 2023The case pertains to two criminal revision applications filed by Makbool Ahmed (accused no.1) and Rajesh Gujar (accused no.2) challenging their convic...
- 30
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.
24 Sep 2013The appellant, Rafiq Hayachand Role, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Kolhapur for the murder of Amar Laxman Mangutti under Section 302 IPC and fo...
- 81
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Robbery in Housebreaking Case — Life Imprisonment Confirmed Based on Dying Declaration and Circumstantial Evidence. The court held that the dying declaration was reliable and the circumstantial evidence formed a complete chain pointing to the guilt of the appellant under Sections 302, 392 read with 397 IPC.
18 Jul 2013The appellant, Sandip Haridas Mankar, was convicted by the Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge-4, Kolhapur, for offences under Sections 451, 452, 461, 38...
- 46
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Bribery Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
25 Aug 2022The appellant, Anil Meshram, a BSNL employee, was convicted by the Special Judge, Gadchiroli for demanding and accepting a bribe of Rs. 1,500 from com...
- 41
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Bench Upholds Conviction of Appellant Under Section 304 Part I IPC for Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder. Appellant convicted for causing death by knife injury, also convicted under Section 324 IPC for causing hurt by dangerous weapon.
8 Mar 2018The appellant, Shaikh Harun s/o Shaikh Hasan, along with his two brothers Shaikh Hussain and Shaikh Rafiq, were charged for offences punishable under ...
- 77
