Search Results for "motive not sine qua non"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...

Search Results for "motive not sine qua non"

290 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 290 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case — Decoy Trap Found Invalid Due to Lack of Prior Complaint and Independent Witnesses. The acquittal of a public servant under Sections 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 was upheld as the prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

23 Mar 2026

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 25.04...

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case — Demand of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Complainant's Failure to Support Prosecution Case and Lack of Independent Witnesses Lead to Confirmation of Acquittal Under Sections 7, 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

20 Mar 2026

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order of acquittal dated...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

16 Mar 2026

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order of acquittal dated...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand. Acquittal of Mamlatdar for Bribe Demand Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand and Acceptance Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

16 Mar 2026

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 29.01...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

20 Jan 2026

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment and order of acquittal dated ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Corruption Case, Restores FIR Against Police Officer for Demand of Bribe. High Court Erred in Quashing FIR at Pre-Evidence Stage by Holding No Demand or Acceptance Without Trial.

1 Jan 2026

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Karnataka through the Lokayukta Police against the judgment of the Karnataka High Court at ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Proceedings Against Company Chairman in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Criminal Intent and Compliance with Tax Demand. Criminal Liability Under Prevention of Corruption Act and IPC Not Made Out as Differential Road Tax Was Paid Upon Demand Under Section 8A of Karnataka Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1957, Rendering Proceedings Abuse of Process.

14 Mar 2022

The appeal arose from an order of the Dharwad Bench of the High Court of Karnataka dismissing a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Cri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Evidence of Demand and Acceptance. Conviction under Sections 7, 12, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

22 Feb 2019

The appellant, Ramdas Waman Tadge, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon, in Special (A.C.B.) Case No. 01 of 2008 for offences unde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7, 12, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

22 Feb 2019

The appellant, Ramdas Waman Tadge, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon, in Special (A.C.B.) Case No. 01 of 2008 for offences unde...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Seeking CBI Investigation into Alleged Irregularities in BEML Limited. Court holds that the petitioner lacked locus standi and the petition was based on unsubstantiated allegations and media reports, not credible material.

5 Aug 2014

The petitioner, Mr. K. Subramanyam Sastry, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the High Court of Karnataka seeking a direction to the Cent...

16 17 18 19 20

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)