Search Results for "invalid detention order"

324 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 324 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Supply of Documents. Failure to Furnish Copies of Relied-Upon Documents to Detenu Violates Article 22(5) and Section 8 of MPDA Act, Rendering Detention Order Invalid.

The petitioner, Rohit Uddhav Kadlaskar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court (Circuit Ben...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Due to Unexplained Delay in Preventive Detention Order. Delay of 35 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 Snaps Live and Proximate Link, Rendering Detention Invalid.

The petitioner, Srinivasan, father of the detenu Indhu @ Indumathi, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Due to Unexplained Delay in Preventive Detention Order. Delay of 37 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Snaps Live and Proximate Link, Rendering Detention Invalid Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982.

The petitioner, Chinaponnu, grandmother of the detenu Vijay, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition in Preventive Detention Case Due to Unexplained Delay. Delay of 51 days between arrest and detention order held to snap live link, rendering detention invalid under Article 22(5) of Constitution.

The petitioner, Pavithra R, the elder sister of the detenu Ajith Kumar, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Due to Unexplained Delay in Preventive Detention Order. Detention Order Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 Quashed as Live and Proximate Link Between Arrest and Detention Order Was Snapped.

The petitioner, Sumathi, mother of the detenu Dhanushkumar, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition, Quashes Detention Order Due to Unexplained Delay Between Arrest and Detention Order. Preventive Detention Order Under Sexual Offender Act Set Aside as Live Link Snapped.

The petitioner, Kumaresan, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court challenging the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Orders for Violation of Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution. Non-supply of Bail Application and Bail Order in Connected Crime Renders Detention Invalid Despite Section 5A of MPDA Act.

The petitioner, Sayed Jafar Sayed Nasir, challenged two detention orders dated 20th February 2018 and 12th March 2018 passed by the Commissioner of Po...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Challenging Detention Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Supply of Verification Statements of In-Camera Witnesses. Failure to Furnish Copies of Verification Statements Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 8(b) of MPDA Act, Rendering Detention Invalid.

The petitioner, Rohidas @ Pintya Laxman Gupte, was detained under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Boo...