Search Results for "higher pension"

594 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 594 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights

The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Directly Recruited Assistant Professors Seeking Stepping Up of Pay Based on Juniors' Pay. Rule 21 of Gujarat Civil Services (Pay) Rules, 2002 Not Applicable Where Anomaly Arises from Counting of Ad Hoc Services of Junior Colleagues.

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of appeals filed by directly recruited Assistant Professors (the appellants) against the judgment of the Division ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes High Court Order in MACP Scheme Case Due to Erroneous Interpretation of Grade Pay Entitlement. Employees Entitled to Immediate Next Higher Grade Pay of Rs.5400 Under Clause 8.1 of MACP Scheme and CCS (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008, Not Based on Next Promotional Post.

The dispute arose from a challenge by the Director, Directorate of Enforcement, New Delhi, and another against a High Court order that granted grade p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Retiral Benefits for Retired Lecturer of Unaided Art School After Grant-in-Aid Sanction. Entire service from 1993 to 2010 must be considered for pension and other benefits under the Maharashtra Grant-in-Aid Rules.

The petitioners, Prakash Arjun Rajeshirke (an individual) and Sahyadri Shikshan Sanstha (an educational trust), filed a writ petition under Article 22...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Recovery from Gratuity of Retired Class III and IV Employees. Recovery of excess payment made due to wrong pay fixation without fault of employee is impermissible after retirement.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by retired Auxiliary Nurse Midwives (ANMs) employed with Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad. The petitioners, J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Premature Retirement of Deputy Director of Health Services. The court upheld the constitutional validity of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 and found the premature retirement order valid based on adverse entries and public interest.

The petitioner, Dr. Mrs. Pratibha Gulhane, a retired Deputy Director of Health Services, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Const...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Counting of Prior Service for Pension Benefits Under ONGC Rules. Resignation from previous employment breaks continuity, and past service cannot be counted for rationalized promotion or pension under the Employees Pension Scheme 1995.

The petitioner, Mr. Seetaram s/o Ganpat Randale, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking directions to the respon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Employee's Petition Against Pension Refixation by Pune Municipal Corporation. Court holds that pension cannot be reduced without affording opportunity of hearing and that fixation of pay at time of promotion cannot be reopened after retirement.

The petitioner, Shri Shrikant Chintaman Joshi, was a retired employee of the Pune Municipal Corporation. He was appointed as an Overseer on 8th July 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Court Officers Seeking Parity in Pension and Retirement Benefits with Higher Judicial Officers. Classification of employees into Class I and Class II based on duties and responsibilities is valid and not discriminatory under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, fifteen officers of the High Court of Bombay holding positions such as Registrar, Prothonotary, Commissioner for Taking Accounts, Add...