Section 6 Specific Relief Act – Proof of Possession Mandatory.
5 Mar 2026This case arose from a dispute over possession of a dispensary premises in Mumbai between family members. The plaintiffs claimed that they were in set...
Search Results for "composite property"
432 result(s) found
Found 432 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Trustees' Challenge to Charge-Sheet Under Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 — Joint Charity Commissioner's Order Quashed for Lack of Application of Mind. The Court held that the charge-sheet under Section 41D of the Act must contain specific allegations and cannot be issued mechanically without considering the trustees' explanation.
23 Jun 2023The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by trustees of a public trust challenging a common order dated 13.08.2021 passed by the Joint Charity...
- 17
High Court
Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal in Part, Upholds Quashing of Government Order Including Dargah as Religious Institution Under Karnataka Education Act. Court Remits for Reconsideration Without High Level Committee Report, Emphasizing Natural Justice and Independent Application of Mind by Government.
6 Mar 2023The case involves a writ appeal filed by Syed Ghouse Mohiyuddin Shah Khadri, the Sajjada Nasheen of Hazrath Dada Hayeth Meer Kalandar Dargah in Chikka...
- 116
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Case — Time Was Essence of Contract; Forfeiture of Earnest Money Upheld. Breach by Buyer in Agreements to Sell Land in Gurgaon Leads to Dismissal of Suit for Specific Performance and Refund of Earnest Money.
11 Feb 2022The case involves a dispute over two agreements to sell agricultural land in Gurgaon, executed on 17.02.2004, between the appellants (sellers) and the...
- 156
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Trust Dispute — Chairman and Petitioner Entitled to Life Trusteeship Under Bye-Law 6. Interpretation of Charitable and Religious Trust Act, 1920, Sections 3 and 7 regarding life trusteeship and appointment of trustees.
11 Oct 2018The present appeal arises from an order dated 29.05.2018 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP No.85687/2013. The appellant, Sardar Veerangouda Pat...
- 39
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Re-Assessment Orders Denying Composition Scheme Benefit to Restaurant — Notice Based on Inspection Report Without Proper Opportunity of Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice. The court held that the impugned orders were passed without affording proper opportunity of hearing and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.
3 Jun 2016The petitioner, Sri Anantha Padmanabha Bhat, proprietor of M/s SLV Corner, a vegetarian restaurant in Bangalore, opted to pay tax under the Compositio...
- 41
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Octroi/LBT Levy on Meal Vouchers — Vouchers Not Goods Under Municipal Law. Meal Vouchers Issued Under Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007 Are Not Goods for Levy of Octroi or Local Body Tax Under Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949.
20 Mar 2015The Bombay High Court addressed two writ petitions filed by Sodexo SVC India Private Limited challenging the levy of octroi and Local Body Tax (LBT) o...
- 114
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Appeal Challenging Family Court Jurisdiction in Divorce Petition Filed by Wife in Pune. Wife's Residence in Pune Confers Jurisdiction Under Section 19(iii)(a) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 as She is the Petitioner.
11 Dec 2014The appellant husband, a US citizen, married the respondent wife on 21st November 2002 in India. The marriage was registered on the same day. The part...
- 216
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Bringing Heirs on Record in Property Suit Appeal — Emphasizes Liberal Approach Under Order 22 Rule 10A CPC. The court set aside the rejection of a composite application for condonation of delay and bringing legal representatives, holding that a separate application to set aside abatement is not necessary.
23 Aug 2012The petitioners, original appellants in Regular Civil Appeal No.524 of 1996, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 9/12/2010 passed by the...
- 68
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch. Notice Signed by Majority of Total Members of Grampanchayat is Valid Under Section 55(2) of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.
6 Apr 2010The case involves two writ petitions filed by Shivkant Bangar and Gavlan Tekale challenging the no-confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch of Gr...
- 72
