Search Results for "Section 31-A"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Section 31-A"

175 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 175 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Three Accused in Dacoity with Murder Case — Life Imprisonment Confirmed for Dacoity Under Section 396 IPC. Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Recovery of Stolen Property Under Section 412 IPC.

15 Apr 2011

The case involves four criminal appeals filed under Section 374 of the Criminal Procedure Code against a common judgment and order of conviction and s...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Considers State's Appeal Against Acquittal of Three Accused in Murder by Drowning. The trial court had acquitted the accused after finding that the prosecution failed to prove the identity of the dead body as the victim and the chain of circumstantial evidence linking them to offences under Sections 302, 364, 201 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

14 Nov 2014

This is a criminal appeal by the State of Goa against the judgment and order dated 20.02.2013 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-1, South Goa, Ma...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Kidnapping, Rape, and Murder of Minor in Appeal Reheard After Supreme Court Remand. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen Theory and Medical Evidence Established Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 364, 376(2)(f), 302, 201 IPC and Section 57 of Bombay Children Act, 1948.

30 Jul 2013

The appellant, Armogam Munnaswami Kounder, was convicted by the trial court on 19th April 2000 for offences under Sections 364, 376(2)(f), 302, and 20...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Mysore (Personal and Miscellaneous) Inams Abolition Act, 1954 as Protected by Article 31A. The Act's Acquisition of Inam Estates Without Provision for Just Equivalent Compensation Did Not Violate Article 31(2) Because It Effected Agrarian Reform Extinguishing Intermediary Rights.

4 Dec 1968

The case involved a constitutional challenge by the petitioners, inamdars of two villages in Mysore, against the Mysore (Personal and Miscellaneous) I...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Tenant's Appeal, Holds Section 84 Not an Alternative to Section 29(1) in Bombay Tenancy Act. Court Rules Invalid Surrender Does Not Entitle Tenant to Summary Eviction Under Section 84, Remedy Lies with Mamlatdar Under Section 29(1).

10 Jan 1969

The dispute arose under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. Respondent 1, the landowner, owned two survey numbers in Panchmahals, Guj...

16 17 18

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)