Search Results for "Sale instances"

780 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 780 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Application Under Section 434 Companies Act Seeking Transfer of Winding-Up Petition to NCLT. Applicant Argues No Irreversible Steps Taken, Citing Supreme Court Precedent.

The matter arose from a Company Petition filed in 2010 seeking winding up of Broadcast Infratel India Private Limited on grounds of unpaid admitted de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Refusal to Register Settlement Deed Due to Non-Application of Mind by Sub-Registrar. Sub-Registrar's Refusal Based on Missing Original Sale Deed and Non-Mutation of Revenue Records Held Invalid Under Section 35 of Registration Act, 1908.

The petitioner, Sorkathkani, and her husband purchased a property measuring 2.5 cents in Shenkottai Town through a registered sale deed dated 2003 (Do...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Landowner's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute. Court Enhanced Compensation to Rs.1191 Per Cent After Applying 60% Deduction to Sale Deed Value, Modifying High Court's Award Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The dispute arose from the acquisition of 1.80 acres of land in Tamil Nadu for a public housing project under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Land...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows IDBI Bank's Appeal in Winding Up Case — Revival of Winding Up Proceedings Set Aside and Sale Deed Directed to Be Executed. Agreement to Sell Not Fraudulent Preference Under Section 531 of Companies Act, 1956 as Executed Beyond Six-Month Period and Bona Fide.

The Supreme Court considered two appeals by IDBI Bank (erstwhile United Western Bank) against judgments of the Madras High Court relating to the windi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Market Value Fixed at Rs.25,000 per Hectare Based on Comparable Sale Instance. Claimant Failed to Prove Higher Market Value Despite Claim of Rs.50,000 per Hectare Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appellant, Anand Tukaram Banmare, was the owner of agricultural land bearing Survey No.362 admeasuring 2.12 H.R. at Mouza Jamb, Tahsil Samudrapur,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appellant's Appeal Seeking Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Burden of Proof Not Discharged. Appellant failed to prove inadequacy of compensation under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 as evidence of comparable sales was not properly established.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by Benjamin Pereira against the judgment and award dated 17th November 2006 passed by the Learned District Judge,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal by Collector and Land Acquisition Officer in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value Reduced from Rs. 22,500 to Rs. 18,000 per Hectare. Sale Deeds from Nearby Villages Considered Comparable with Deduction for Distance and Lack of Development.

The case involves a land acquisition dispute where the Collector and Land Acquisition Officer appealed against the enhancement of compensation by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case Due to Lack of Comparable Evidence. Reference Court's enhancement of compensation set aside as unsupported by evidence of market value or potential use.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the Joint Civil Judge, Yavatmal, which enhanced compensation for land acquired under the Lan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. The court held that the plaintiff's title as sole heir was established and the defendant failed to prove adverse possession.

The second appeal arose from a suit for possession and mesne profits filed by the original plaintiff (since deceased, represented by legal heirs) agai...