Search Results for "MPDA Act"

269 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 269 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case Due to Non-Application of Mind. Court holds that the detaining authority failed to consider the detenue's bail status and the availability of alternative remedies under ordinary law, rendering the detention order invalid.

The petitioner, Ram Raju @ Jatalya Umap, challenged a preventive detention order passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under Section 3(2) of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Bail Status of Detenu.

The petitioner, Suryakant @ Mukesh Laxman Dhotre, was detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Dru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Unexplained Delay in Disposal of Representation. Failure to Consider Detenu's Representation Promptly Violates Article 22(5) of the Constitution, Rendering Detention Invalid.

The petitioner, Yahya @ Ayya Akbar Khan, challenged a preventive detention order dated 30 July 2016 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Mumbai, unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind to Bail Conditions. Detenu Granted Bail in One Case and Remanded in Another, Yet Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Likelihood of Release and Continued Dangerous Activity.

The petitioner, Mohammed Asif @ Mental Abdul Sattar Shaikh @ Mohd. Asif @ Mental Abdul Sattar Khan, challenged a preventive detention order dated 15.1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unreasonable Delay in Considering Representation. Unexplained Delay of 25 Days in Deciding Representation Renders Detention Illegal Under Article 22(5) of Constitution.

The petitioner, Mr. Rizwan @ Tippu Sattar Pathan, challenged an order of detention dated 5th May 2014 passed under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Pre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay. Unexplained Delay of Over Two Months Between In-Camera Statements and Detention Order Breaks Live Link, Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution.

The petitioner, brother of the detenu, challenged the detention order dated 7th July 2005 passed under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activit...