Search Results for "Karnataka Law Officers Rules 1977"

295 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 295 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Addresses Challenge to National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (NEET) Notifications for Medical Admissions. The court examines the regulatory power of medical councils and the impact on minority educational institutions under Articles 19(1)(g) and 30 of the Constitution.

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of writ petitions and transferred cases challenging four notifications issued by the Medical Council of India...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Penalty of Dismissal Substituted by Compulsory Retirement in Disciplinary Proceeding — State Challenges Tribunal's Modification of Punishment for Misconduct by Typist.

The State of Karnataka and its authorities filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 04.01.2018...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Insurance Ombudsman Award for Violation of Natural Justice — Employer Not Heard Before Award. Group Personal Accident Policy Claim Decided Without Notice to Employer, Award Set Aside and Remitted for Fresh Hearing.

The petitioner, M/s. Toyota Kirloskar Motor Pvt. Ltd., is a company engaged in the manufacture of motor vehicles. It had contracted a 'Group Personal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Issues Directions for Migrant Labourers in Suo Motu Writ Petition During COVID-19 Pandemic. The Court ordered transportation, food provision, and withdrawal of prosecutions under Section 51 of the Disaster Management Act, 2005, to address miseries caused by lockdown and pandemic fears.

The Supreme Court of India, in a suo motu writ petition, addressed the severe hardships faced by migrant labourers during the COVID-19 pandemic, which...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Seniority Dispute Over Catch-Up Rule for Reserved Category Promotions. Consequential Seniority for Scheduled Caste Promotee Upheld as Regular Promotion Not Fortuitous.

The case involves a seniority dispute between two officers of the Government of Maharashtra: Sudhakar Baburao Nangnure (appellant, open category) and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Whether Service for Time Bound Promotion Should Be Reckoned from Initial Appointment or Regularisation Date. Government Resolution and Supreme Court Precedents on 'Regular Service' Interpreted in Context of TBPS and ACPS.

The case involved a batch of writ petitions filed by the State of Maharashtra under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging orde...