Search Results for "Joint Hindu family business"

263 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 263 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against NCLAT Order in Competition Law Case — Locus Standi of Informant Under Section 19(1)(a) of Competition Act, 2002. The Court held that the expression 'any person' in Section 19(1)(a) is wide and does not require the informant to be a consumer or competitor.

The appeal arose from an information filed by Samir Agrawal, an independent law practitioner, before the Competition Commission of India (CCI) on 13.0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Winding Up Petition Against Airline Company for Inability to Pay Debts. Creditor's Statutory Demand for USD 3 Million Remained Unpaid, Leading to Order for Winding Up Under Sections 433(e) and (f) of the Companies Act, 1956.

The petitioner, Aerotron Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales, filed a company petition under Sections 433(e) and (f) r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Winding-Up Petition Against Kingfisher Airlines Ltd. for Lack of Service of Statutory Notice. Petition under Sections 433(e) and (f) of the Companies Act, 1956 fails as petitioner Aerotron Limited did not prove service of demand notice under Section 434.

The petitioner, Aerotron Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales, filed a winding-up petition under Sections 433(e) and (f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Winding Up Petition Against Airline Company for Inability to Pay Debts Under Companies Act, 1956. The court held that the company was commercially insolvent and unable to pay its debts, and appointed the Official Liquidator to take charge of its assets.

The petitioner, Aerotron Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales, filed a company petition under Sections 433(e) and (f) r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Revision Against Trial Court's Jurisdiction Ruling in SARFAESI Act Suit. Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Entertain Suit for Permanent Injunction Against Re-auction of Mortgaged Property Despite SARFAESI Act Provisions.

The respondent, original plaintiff, filed Regular Civil Suit No.1756 of 2014 seeking a permanent injunction restraining the applicant bank from re-auc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute — Sets Aside Decree for Specific Performance. Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellant, Mrs. Kiran Nashine, filed two appeals against the judgment and decree dated 30.09.2009 passed by the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Transfer of Investigation in Alleged Offences Against Brother. Court finds no credible material to warrant transfer of investigation to Crime Branch, as police had already conducted inquiry and found no substance in allegations.

The petitioner, Bertram D'Silva, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking directions to the State authorities to a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit — Appellants Fail to Prove Exclusive Title Over Suit Property. Court upholds trial court's finding that suit property was joint family property and not self-acquired, dismissing appeal for lack of evidence.

The appellants, five sisters, filed a suit for partition and separate possession of a property situated at Village Manor, Taluka Palghar, District Tha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Specific Performance — Concurrent findings of fact by trial and appellate courts cannot be interfered with under Article 227 unless perverse or without jurisdiction.

The petitioners, legal representatives of the original defendant Shankar Mahada Kardile, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution o...