Search Results for "Explanation sale"

3073 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3073 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Demand of VAT on Pan Masala Containing Tobacco under MVAT Act, 2002. Exemption Under Schedule Entry A-45 Upheld and Part Payment Orders Quashed as Explanation Inserted by Notification dated 21.01.2006 Held Ultra Vires.

The dispute arose under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 regarding the levy of VAT on pan masala containing tobacco (gutkha/mawa) for the fin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reverses High Court's Decision in Property Title Dispute Due to Lack of Evidence on Power of Attorney. Concurrent Findings of Lower Courts Restored as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Compliance with Registration Act for Foreign-Executed Document.

The dispute originated from a civil suit filed by the original plaintiffs seeking declaration of title and recovery of possession over a property, all...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Case, Reversing High Court's Setting Aside of Concurrent Findings. High Court Erred in Holding Plaint Lacked Specific Averments Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963, as Readiness and Willingness Must Be Inferred from Plaint as a Whole.

The dispute arose from an agreement to sell executed on 10.10.1976 by Ram Singh in favor of Sughar Singh for a sale consideration of Rs.56,000, with R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Temporary Injunction in Specific Performance Suit — Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience Found in Favor of Plaintiff. Agreement to Sell and Part Payment Established, Injunction to Prevent Alienation Upheld Under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

The present appeal arises from an order dated 12.02.2025 passed by the Prl. Senior Civil Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, Bengaluru, allowing I.A. Nos...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds SEBI Order Against Corporate Giant in Futures Manipulation Case. The Court held that cornering 93.63% open interest through agents and dumping shares to depress settlement price constituted fraud under PFUTP Regulations.

The case involves appeals by Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) against orders of the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) which upheld SEBI's findings ...