Search Results for "Criminal Trespass"

319 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 319 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 324, 504, 506 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The judgment pertains to three criminal appeals arising from a single incident of assault resulting in the death of one person and injuries to others....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age of Victim. Conviction under Section 376 IPC and Section 4 of POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Victim Was Below 18 Years.

The appellant, Kawadu Madhukar Atram, was convicted by the Special Judge and Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur in Special (POCSO) Case 70 of 2016 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Dacoity and House Trespass in Pune Robbery Case. Identification of Accused by Victims in Light of Burning Bulb Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Sections 395 and 457 IPC.

The appellant, Jalindersing Ajitsing Kalyani, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, in Sessions Case No.160 of 2008 for offenc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Discharge Application in Murder Case Based on Prima Facie Evidence of Conspiracy. Court upholds rejection of discharge under Section 227 CrPC as material on record shows strong suspicion of involvement in offences under Sections 302, 452, 120-B read with Section 34 IPC.

The applicant, Ramlal Katre, was accused No.1 in Sessions Trial No. 328 of 2015 for offences under Sections 302, 452, 120-B read with Section 34 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Stale Grounds. The court held that the detaining authority failed to consider the detenu's custody and the delay in passing the order vitiated the subjective satisfaction.

The petitioner, Samad Salim Khan, challenged an order of preventive detention passed by the Commissioner of Police, Mumbai, under Section 3(2) of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction for Rape and House Trespass After Appellant Served Sentence. Conviction under Sections 451 and 376 IPC Upheld Based on Consistent Testimony of Victim and Medical Evidence.

The appellant, Yogesh Janardhan Shinde, was convicted by the 1st Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan, for offences under Sections 451 (house tresp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Possession of Tenanted Flat Due to Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 33 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Dispute Between Siblings Over Possession of Flat Held Exclusively Triable by Small Causes Court, Not Civil Court.

The plaintiff, Arun Bhaskar Adarkar, a senior citizen of Indian origin residing in the USA, filed a suit in the Bombay High Court seeking possession o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder, Robbery, and House Trespass in Doctor's Killing — Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen Theory and Recovery of Stolen Articles Sufficient to Prove Guilt.

The appellant, Sunil Nirmal Bisth, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge for Greater Bombay in Sessions Case No.1267 of 1996 for offe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Unreliable and Contradictory Testimony. Acquittal of four accused under Sections 147, 148, 307, 324, 452 read with 149 IPC upheld as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 6th March 1996 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ratnagiri, in Sessions ...