Search Results for "Central Motor Vehicle Rules"

288 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 288 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses KSRTC Appeals in Motor Accident Claims, Upholds Tribunal Awards for Injured and Deceased Victims. Contributory Negligence Not Established; Compensation Enhanced for Loss of Consortium and Future Prospects.

The case involves four miscellaneous first appeals filed by the Managing Director of KSRTC (North West Division) against the judgment and award dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Credible Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 279, 337, 304A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The revision petitioner, Satish Ganapati Gunagi, was convicted by the JMFC, Ankola in C.C. No. 62/2007 for offences under Sections 279 (rash driving),...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Death of Court Amin in Motor Vehicle Accident - Negligence and Liability of Insurer Upheld. Multiplier of 9 applied as per Sarla Verma; conventional heads enhanced as per Pranay Sethi.

The appeal was filed by the legal representatives of the deceased M. Basavarajappa, who died in a motor vehicle accident that occurred on 19.07.2007. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Cenvat Credit Case for Mobile Phones. Service Tax Paid on Mobile Phones Used by Employees Held Eligible for Cenvat Credit Under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.

The case is an appeal filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Goa, against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Refund Case — Assessee Passed on Duty Incidence to Customers, Refund Claim Rejected. Section 12B of Central Excise Act, 1944 bars refund if duty burden shifted to others.

The appellant, M/s. Toyota Kirloskar Motor Ltd., is engaged in manufacturing passenger utility vehicles and parts thereof, which are excisable under C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Strict Enforcement of Helmet Law in Public Interest Litigation. Court Emphasizes Compliance with Section 129 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 to Reduce Road Fatalities.

The petitioner, Free Legal Aid Cell (NGO), filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court seeking directions for strict enforcement o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Strict Enforcement of Helmet Law in Public Interest Litigation. Court Orders State to Ensure Compliance with Section 129 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 to Reduce Fatal Road Accidents.

The Bombay High Court disposed of a public interest litigation filed by Free Legal Aid Cell (NGO) seeking enforcement of the mandatory helmet law unde...