Search Results for "Bombay Rent Act Eviction"

1133 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1133 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Writ Petition in Eviction Suit — Reverses Appellate Court's Dismissal for Non-Prosecution. Landlord's Bonafide Need for Suit Block Established; Tenant's Irregular Rent Payment Proved.

The petitioner, Abdul Gani, was the plaintiff in Regular Civil Suit No. 195/2013 seeking eviction of the respondent-tenant, Dilip Gopaldas Duwani, fro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Reversioners' Suit for Possession Against Tenant of Life Tenant. Life Tenant's Lease Does Not Survive Her Death; Tenant Becomes Trespasser.

The appeal arises from a judgment of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in a second appeal, which reversed the trial court's decree for possession i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Petition in Eviction Suit — Landlord Failed to Prove Bona Fide Need for Residential Premises Under Section 16 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Tenant's Use of Rear Rooms for Storage and Occasional Stay Did Not Constitute Subletting or Change of User.

The petitioner, a tenant, challenged the judgment and order dated 11th August 1999 passed by the Additional District Judge, Thane, which partly decree...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition in Rent Control Eviction Suit for Landlord's Bona Fide Need. Landlord's Title Under Will and Bona Fide Requirement for Advocate's Office Upheld Under Section 16(1)(g) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The petitioner, Manhar Auto Stores, a partnership concern, was a tenant in a shop premises owned by Dr. Hansrajbhai Shah, who executed a registered Wi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition Challenging Eviction Decree for Default in Rent Payment Under Bombay Rent Act. Concurrent findings of courts below that tenant was defaulter upheld as no substantial question of law arose under Article 227.

The petitioner-tenant filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the concurrent findings of the trial court and ...