Search Results for "Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976"

309 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 309 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Plaintiff's Claim for Possession in Property Dispute Based on Title and Rejects Adverse Possession Defense. Licensee's Possession Cannot Be Converted into Adverse Possession Without Clear Evidence of Ouster.

The dispute pertained to a suit property in Bangalore. The original plaintiff, A. Krishnappa, claimed ownership of the property as joint family proper...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Reserves Judgment on Condonation of Delay in Land Acquisition Appeal Filed Beyond 120 Days Under 2013 Act. Issue of Whether Section 5 of Limitation Act Applies to Section 74(1) of Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013 Remains to be Decided.

The Deputy Commissioner and Special Land Acquisition Officer, Bengaluru (SLAO) filed an appeal under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeals by Transport Authorities Against State Tourism Corporation's Tax Exemption Claim. Tourist Vehicles of Andhra Pradesh State Tourism Corporation Not Exempt from Tax Under Karnataka Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1957 Despite Notification Dated 22.03.1994.

The case involves an intra-court appeal filed by the Assistant Regional Transport Officer and the Deputy Commissioner for Transports against an order ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Lokayukta Report and Disciplinary Proceedings Against BWSSB Engineer for Unauthorised Construction Allegation — Report Under Section 12(3) of Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 Set Aside for Non-Application of Mind and Violation of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Sri S.V. Ramesh, an Assistant Executive Engineer with the Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board (BWSSB), filed a writ petition und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging BDA Site Allotments Due to Lack of Standing and Delay. Petitioner failed to establish title or locus standi to challenge allotments made to respondents 3 to 6 in 2003-2009.

The petitioner, Wajid Pasha, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Banga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Directs BDA to Allot Alternate Site to Purchaser After Original Site Acquired for Road Widening — Petitioner Entitled to Alternate Site at Same Price as Original Allotment

The petitioner, Smt. N. Dhakshayini, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to BDA Scheme Non-Lapse and Government's Withdrawal Notification. Scheme Under BDA Act Does Not Lapse Automatically Under Section 27; Government's Power to Withdraw from Acquisition Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Upheld.

The petitioner, Sri H. Krishna Reddy, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a declaration that the 'By...