Search Results for "unreasonable inaction"

308 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 308 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Revisional Order Allowing Liquor Licence in Village Where Women's Gramsabha Resolution Banned Liquor — Held That Gramsabha Resolution Under Section 138 of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Must Be Given Due Weight and Cannot Be Ignored by Revisional Authority.

The petitioners, residents of Village Chas (kaman), Taluka Khed, Dist. Pune, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Complainant's Appeal in Criminal Quashing Case — High Court Erred in Quashing Criminal Proceedings Under Section 482 CrPC Without Considering Prima Facie Case. Allegations of Forgery and Cheating in Sale Deed Execution Require Trial, Not Quashing at Threshold.

The appellant-complainant lodged a private complaint against the private respondents alleging offences under Sections 120B, 201, 419, 471, 468 and 420...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Decides Appeal by Bangalore Development Authority Against Injunction Decree in Land Acquisition Dispute. Court's Final Decision Not Reached in Provided Text as Judgment Excerpt is Incomplete.

The appeal arose from a suit for permanent injunction filed by the plaintiffs, brother and sister, claiming ownership and possession of land in Survey...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition and Declares Land Acquisition Lapsed Under Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Due to Non-Compliance with Time Limit. Award Excluding Subject Lands and Subsequent Inaction for Over Two Decades Leads to Lapsing of Acquisition Proceedings.

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landowner Laxman Mahadev Katkar, challenged the land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition Due to 38-Year Delay and Laches. Consent terms entered by petitioner's father in 1966 binding on petitioner; possession taken in 1972; petition filed in 2010 without explanation.

The petitioner, Abhay V. Khinvasara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of land bearing ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Mutation Entries and Revenue Records in Land Dispute — Holds That Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Title and Revenue Authorities Must Follow Natural Justice Before Making Entries Affecting Rights.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by individuals challenging mutation entries made in revenue records in respect of certain lands. The pe...