Search Results for "undivided shares"

269 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 269 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Tahsildar's Endorsement Rejecting Mutation Entry for Land Granted Under Section 94 of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964. Revenue Authorities Cannot Adjudicate Title or Validity of Grant in Mutation Proceedings; Mutation Entries Are Only for Fiscal Purposes.

The petitioners, five individuals, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal as Abated Due to Non-Substitution of Legal Heirs of Deceased Appellant in Property Title Suit. Appeal Abates Entirely When Deceased Appellant's Interest is Inseparable from Co-Appellants, Rendering Inconsistent Decrees Impossible.

The Supreme Court dismissed the civil appeals filed by the defendants/appellants against the judgment of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh which had co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Fragmentation Act Case — Preferential Right of Contiguous Land Owner Upheld. Sale of Fragmented Land to Non-Contiguous Purchaser Violates Section 7 of Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947.

The appellant, Vilas Shivmurti Munde, filed a second appeal against the dismissal of his suit for declaration and injunction. The suit sought to decla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses RSA in Final Decree Proceedings — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. Appellants failed to challenge preliminary decree and cannot raise objections in final decree proceedings under Order 21 Rule 18 read with Section 54 of CPC.

The present Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was filed by the judgment debtors (appellants) against the ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Trial Court Judgment for Lack of Reasons in Declaration and Injunction Suit — Remands for Fresh Disposal. Court finds that the Trial Court failed to discuss evidence or assign reasons on issues framed, rendering the judgment unsustainable under Order 20 Rule 4(2) CPC.

The appellant, who was the defendant in the original suit, challenged the judgment and decree dated 23 June 2014 passed by the XLIII Additional City C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Genuine. Court finds that the plaintiff failed to discharge burden of proving the agreement and that the defendant's possession was permissive, not as a prospective purchaser.

The appellant, M/s Multicon Builders, a registered partnership firm through its partner Suryakant Gendasingh Thakur, was the original defendant no.9 i...