Search Results for "state monopoly"

238 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 238 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Amendments to Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing Act. Petitioners Seek Declaration that Deletion of 'Trader' from Section 72 and Insertion of Rule 76-A are Unconstitutional.

The present proceedings comprised a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, under Articles 226 and 227 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Transfer Order of Female Employee in Bangalore Turf Club Ltd. — Transfer Held Malicious and Without Authority of Law. Transfer order issued by Secretary without authority from Managing Committee under Articles of Association is void ab initio.

The petitioner, Smt. Veena Harish, was employed as an Accounts Officer at the Bangalore Turf Club Ltd., a company incorporated under the erstwhile Com...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bayer's Challenge to Compulsory License for Nexavar Under Section 84 of Patents Act, 1970. Court Holds That Patentee's Import of Drug at High Price Does Not Satisfy Reasonable Requirements of Public or Constitute Working of Invention in India.

The petitioner, Bayer Corporation, a US-based pharmaceutical company, held a patent for the drug Sorafenib Tosylate, sold under the brand name Nexavar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Infringement of Well-Known Mark 'Raymond' in Domain Name for Dissimilar Goods; Discusses Scope of Section 29(4) of Trade Marks Act, 1999. Domain Name 'raymondpharma.com' Not Found to Infringe 'Raymond' Mark Under Section 29(4) Due to Dissimilar Goods and Prior Litigation Bar.

The dispute arose from the Plaintiff Raymond Limited's claim that the Defendant Raymond Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd. infringed its well-known registered t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 17A of PC Act — FIR Registered Without Prior Approval from Competent Authority for Investigation Against Public Servant

The petitioner, Ningappa G @ Ningappa Savant, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.PC) / Section 52...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — No Deceptive Similarity Between 'Palm Grove' and 'Royal Palms' Hotels. Plaintiff's use of 'Palm Grove' always in combination with 'Ramada' and delay disentitled it to interim relief.

The Plaintiff, Palm Grove Beach Hotels Pvt. Ltd., owned and operated a mid-range hotel in Juhu, Mumbai, under the name 'Ramada Plaza Palm Grove' (prev...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Suit for Trade Mark Infringement and Passing Off Against Defendants Over 'SUNCONTROL' Mark. The Court held that 'SUNCONTROL' is descriptive and not distinctive, and that the plaintiff failed to establish secondary meaning or likelihood of confusion.

The plaintiff, Garware Polyester Limited, filed a suit for trade mark infringement and passing off against 3M Company and 3M India Limited, alleging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction to Plaintiff in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case. The court restrained the defendant from using deceptively similar 'PRINCE' and crown device marks for PVC pipes, finding a strong prima facie case of infringement and passing off.

The plaintiff, Prince Pipes and Fittings Ltd., a Mumbai-based company, has been using the mark 'PRINCE' and a 'crown device' since 1987 for manufactur...