Search Results for "special planning authority"

1155 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1155 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tahsildar's Demand for Royalty on Excavated Material During Construction. Held that Tahsildar lacks jurisdiction to levy royalty on material excavated pursuant to valid development permission under MRTP Act and NA permission under MLR Code.

The petitioner, originally Flagship Infrastructure Pvt Ltd and now Paranjape Schemes (Construction) Limited, filed a writ petition challenging a show ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Challenge to Stop Work Notice and Directions Under Regulation 58 of DCR for Greater Bombay 1991. Dispute Concerns Obligation of Cotton Textile Mill to Hand Over Land for Worker Housing and Open Spaces Immediately After Layout Approval.

The matter concerned two properties owned by a textile company in Mumbai: a mill at Prabhadevi and Spring Mills at Dadar. The company closed the latte...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against High Court's Order Regarding Development Licenses and Building Plans. Dispute Centers on Compliance with Town Planning Norms and Apartment Ownership Act.

The present batch of civil appeals, with the lead matter arising out of SLP(C) No. 11480 of 2020, originated from the judgment and order dated 10 July...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Public Interest Litigation on Encroachments on Public Utility Land in Nagpur. Petition Treated as PIL and Notice Issued to Authorities for Removal of Encroachments on Reserved Lands.

The matter involves a public interest litigation filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, by social workers Madhukar Sampatr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Upholds PMC's Demolition Notices for Illegal Green Belt Constructions in Pune. Petitioners' Plea for Regularization Rejected; Costs Imposed for Violations of Environmental Regulations

The petitioners challenge the demolition notices issued by the Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC) for illegal structures built in the green belt zone on...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment on Challenge to DCR 33(7) Surplus Area Surrender for Cessed Building Rehabilitation. Petitioners Contended Compulsory Acquisition Without Adequate Compensation.

The group of writ petitions before the Bombay High Court challenged the constitutional validity of clause 4 of Appendix III to Regulation 33(7) of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Refund of Premium for Unutilized FSI in Land Development Case — Absence of Statutory Bar Permits Refund When Privilege Not Availed. Appellants Paid Premium for Extra FSI but Abandoned Project; Court Held Retention of Premium Without Benefit Amounts to Unjust Enrichment.

The appellants, Prasad Pandurang Tapkir and Shakuntala Pandurang Tapkir, owned agricultural land in Survey No. 103/2/2 of Alandi Taluka, Pune District...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Violation of Natural Justice. Demolition Order Set Aside as Issued Without Show Cause Notice or Hearing, Despite Alleged Unauthorized Construction in Heritage Precinct.

The petitioners, Raul Aires Fernandes and John Aires Fernandes, filed a writ petition challenging a demolition notice dated 30 March 2016 issued by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Heritage Committee's Approval for Demolition of Heritage Building. Court holds that the Heritage Committee's decision is final and binding, and the petitioners failed to demonstrate any illegality or arbitrariness in the approval process.

The petitioners, Prakash V. Patel and Dilnar Jehanbux Chichgar, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court challenging the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Municipal Corporation's Mandamus for Land Acquisition Due to Lapsed Reservation and Financial Incapacity. Reservation under Development Plan Lapsed Under Section 127 of MRTP Act, 1966, and Acquisition Not Mandated as Corporation Lacked Funds Under RFCTLARR Act, 2013.

The dispute involved a land reservation under the Kolhapur development plan sanctioned in 1999 for public purposes like parking and garden. The landow...