Search Results for "section 86(5)"

172 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 172 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Immoral Trafficking Case Due to Unreliable Testimony. Conviction under Sections 373, 366A, 368, 323 IPC and Sections 3, 4 of PITA set aside as sole witness's testimony was inconsistent and uncorroborated.

The appellants, accused Nos. 2 and 3, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, in Sessions Case No.865 of 2002 for offences un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Reservation of Wards in Municipal Elections. Petitioners Seek to Quash State Government Notifications Reserving Wards for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and Backward Classes.

Multiple writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, challenging the notifications issued by the State Government regar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Defendant in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — Use of 'KATARIA INSURANCE' Held Deceptively Similar to Plaintiff's Registered Marks 'KATARIA' and 'KATARIA INSURANCE CONSULTANCY' Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The plaintiff, Bhavesh Suresh Kataria, proprietor of Kataria Jewellery Insurance Consultancy, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness's evidence was inconsistent and uncorroborated.

The case involves three appellants, Bablya Baliram Madhvi, Namdeo Padu Gaikwad, and Sanjay Arjun Ahire, who were convicted by the 3rd Additional Sessi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as evidence of interested witnesses and identification parade was flawed.

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from a judgment of the Sessions Court convicting multiple accused for murder under Section 302 read wit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal, Sets Aside High Court Judgment in Punjab Sales Tax Case Over Deduction on Cotton Seed Sales. Cotton Seeds Obtained After Ginning Held Not Same as Unginned Cotton for Purchase Turnover Deduction Under Section 5(2)(a)(vi) of Punjab Sales Tax Act, 1948.

The Supreme Court considered whether a dealer was entitled under the Punjab Sales Tax Act, 1948 to deduct from his purchase turnover the sale price of...