Search Results for "section 34 ipc"

245 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 245 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Sections 302, 324, 504, 506 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against the conviction of the appellants (accused nos. 1 and 5 in some appeals, and accused no. 2 in another) by the Fa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as identification of accused was doubtful and recovery of weapon was not linked to the crime.

The appellant, Anil Shashikant Alve, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai, for the murder of Santosh Karunakaran Malli under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 302/324 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove common intention and reliable eyewitness account.

The case involves an appeal by four accused persons against their conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik, for offences under Sections 302...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish the common object and individual overt acts beyond reasonable doubt.

The judgment pertains to two criminal appeals filed by the original accused No.1 (Shafi Nabab Sayyed) and accused No.2 (Asim Jamaloddin Momin) challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Culpable Homicide Case Due to Inconsistent Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 304 Part II IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appeal arises from a judgment of the Sessions Judge, Bhandara, convicting the appellants under Section 304 Part II read with Section 34 of the Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused No.3 in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Last Seen Evidence and Motive Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 302 IPC, While Acquittal of Co-Accused Upheld for Lack of Evidence.

The case involves two appeals arising from a common judgment of the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur, dated 7th April 2003, in Sessions Case ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Defamation Process Against Society Members for Lack of Specific Allegations. Complaint under Sections 500, 501, 34 IPC fails to identify which accused published the alleged defamatory letter.

The petitioners, six residents of Om Arpan CHS Ltd., Thane, were accused in Regular Criminal Case No.614/2006 under Sections 500 and 501 read with Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Eyewitness Accounts and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Popat @ Bhujangrao Bhausaheb Mahurkar, Sou. Vandana Popat Mahurkar, and Kum. Meena Bhausaheb Mahurkar, were convicted by the V Ad-hoc ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Failed to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, Raju Radakya Umbarsada and Sou. Taibai Babu Kakad, were convicted by the First Ad-Hoc District and Sessions Judge at Palghar, District...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as evidence of sole eyewitness was inconsistent and uncorroborated.

The case involves an appeal against conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC for murder. The prosecution case relied heavily on the testimony of ...