Search Results for "revision under Mamlatdar’s Court Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "revision under Mamlatdar’s Court Act"

247 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 247 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revision Order — Revisional Court Erred in Entertaining Revision Under Section 438 BNSS Against Order Under Section 164 BNSS Without Notice. Order Under Section 164 BNSS Is Summary and Not Subject to Revision; Natural Justice Violated.

15 Jun 2026

The petitioner, Shri Noberto Paulo Sebastiao Fernandes, through his constituted attorney, filed a criminal writ petition before the High Court of Bomb...

High Court

High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Mamlatdar's Courts Act Orders Due to Procedural Defects and Lack of Substantive Findings. Tahsildar's Order Granting Way Access Under Section 5 Set Aside as Applications Failed to Specify Obstruction Details and Panchnamas Were Conducted Without Proper Notice.

10 Mar 2026

The dispute concerned proceedings under the Mamlatdar's Courts Act, 1906 regarding access to agricultural lands. The petitioners were landowners whose...

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Allows Revision, Rejects Plaint in Specific Performance Suit Involving New Tenure Land. Agreement to Sell New Tenure Land Without Collector's Permission is Void Under Section 43 of Gujarat Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948, and Suit Based on Such Agreement is Barred by Law.

3 Mar 2026

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by the original defendants (Dilipbhai Parshottambhai Patel and others) against an order of the le...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Revenue Revision Order in Land Dispute — Upholds Purchaser's Title Based on Registered Sale Deed and Adverse Possession. The court held that the revisional authority exceeded its jurisdiction by reopening settled entries after 17 years without notice to the purchasers, violating principles of natural justice.

17 Feb 2026

The writ applicants, Koli Parshottambhai Narsinhbhai and another, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India cha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revenue Tribunal Order in Land Mutation Dispute — Failure to Consider Evidence and Apply Correct Legal Principles. Court sets aside order for non-consideration of documentary evidence and misapplication of Section 149 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

30 Jan 2026

The petitioners, legal representatives of the original owners Govind Goma Gaikar and Laxmi Govind Gaikar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Trust's Petition Challenging Tenant's Purchase Right Under Bombay Tenancy Act — Mutation Entry Not Sufficient to Establish Res Judicata. The court held that a mutation entry recording rejection of an earlier application under Section 32G of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, without the underlying order, does not bar a subsequent application on principles of res judicata.

2 Aug 2024

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by a trust challenging the orders of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (MRT) and the Agricultural...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Revenue Tribunal Order in Tenancy Dispute — Petitioners Failed to Establish Tenancy Rights Over Land in Absence of Mutation Entry and Adverse Possession. The court held that the burden to prove tenancy lies on the claimant and that the claim was barred by limitation as the petitioners had not been in possession for over 12 years.

16 Jun 2022

The petitioners, Shamrao Rambhau Konde and Gulabrao Rambhau Konde, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Concurrent Orders Under Maharashtra Tenancy Act — Petitioner Failed to Prove Tenant Status. Landlord's Application for Possession Under Section 32-O Allowed as Tenant Could Not Establish Cultivation After Tillers' Day.

26 Feb 2020

The petitioner, Shri Ananda Sakharam Padalkar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and order...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Orders Under Section 32(3) of Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 — Deputy Director Lacked Jurisdiction to Reopen Final Consolidation Scheme After 30 Years. The court held that once a certificate under Section 22 is issued, the scheme attains finality and cannot be reopened under Section 32(3) except for clerical errors.

13 Feb 2020

The petitioners, Padmabai Narayan Chaudhary and others, filed a writ petition challenging two orders passed by the Deputy Director of Land Records, Au...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Application in Right of Way Dispute Under Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906 — Civil Court Jurisdiction Upheld. Suit for Declaration and Permanent Injunction Not Barred by Section 21(2) of the Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906 as the Provision Only Bars Suits for Removal of Obstruction.

23 Mar 2017

The case arises from a dispute over a right of way in village Kawadshi. The applicants (original defendants 5 to 9) challenged an order of the trial c...

15 16 17 18 19

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)