Search Results for "revision against conviction"

1083 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1083 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Conviction under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 set aside as complainant failed to establish that the cheque was issued for a legally enforceable debt or liability.

The revision petition was filed by Sri. Shanmugam (petitioner) against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 03.12.2022 passed in C.C.No.259/2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Conviction in Cheque Bounce Case but Reduces Compensation Amount. Dishonour of Cheque for Rs. 7,10,000 under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sentence reduced from Rs. 7,10,000 to Rs. 4,70,000.

The petitioner, M/s. Banavathy & Company, filed a criminal revision petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 Cr.P.C. against the judgment date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Discharges Accused in CBI Case for Alleged Procurement Irregularities in SAFAR Project. Court holds that mere procedural lapses without proof of criminal intent or loss do not constitute offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Indian Penal Code, 1860.

The case arises from a CBI investigation into alleged irregularities in the procurement of Digital Display Systems for the SAFAR project by the Indian...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Forest Offence Case Due to Procedural Lapses and Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Karnataka Forest Act and Wildlife Protection Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove possession of forest produce beyond reasonable doubt.

The revision petitioner, Pramod S/o Arjun Kanakupakar, was convicted by the Civil Judge & JMFC, Dandeli in C.C.No.735/2010 for offences under Sections...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Cheating and Forgery Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Complainant Failed to Prove That Accused Forged Documents or Cheated Him in Plot Sale Transaction Under Sections 420, 468, 471, 109 read with Section 34 IPC.

The case arises from a criminal revision application filed by the original informant, Sharad Bonde, and an appeal by the State of Maharashtra against ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Negligence. Conviction Under Section 304-A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove That the Accident Was Caused by the Accused's Rash or Negligent Driving.

The case pertains to a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, K.M. Appachu, challenging his conviction under Sections 279 and 304-A of the I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Cheating Case — Conviction Under Section 420 IPC Upheld. Accused No.1 Sentenced to Three Years Rigorous Imprisonment for Cheating Complainant by Selling Fake Gold.

The petitioner, Korachara Nagaraj @ Yeradethinahalli Naga, was convicted by the trial court (C.J.(Jr.Dn.) & JMFC, Huvinahadagali) in C.C.No.445/2008 f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision, Sets Aside Order Rejecting Discharge Application for Non-Compliance with Sections 226 and 227 Cr.P.C. — Mandatory Hearing Before Framing of Charge in Sessions Case

The revision petitioner, Balam Gulab Pathan, was the original accused in a sessions case for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Pe...