Search Results for "rash and negligent driving"

1372 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1372 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court allowed Insurance Company's Appeal and also cross objection of claimant for Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim -- Tribunal's Award Modified with Increased Compensation

The High Court heard two connected matters: Insurance Company challenging the Tribunal's award holding them liable, and MFA CROB No.27/2014 filed by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Insurance Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Interest Rate from 7.5% to 6% Per Annum. No Contributory Negligence Found as Tribunal's Finding of Negligence on Part of Xylo Driver Was Based on Evidence and Not Shown to Be Perverse.

The appeal was filed by Reliance General Insurance Company Limited under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment dated 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Tempo Driver Upheld. Compensation of Rs.18,17,000/- with 9% Interest Affirmed as Just and Fair.

The case arises from a motor vehicle accident on 08/01/2013, where the deceased Vikas Bharne was riding a motorcycle and was hit by a tempo coming fro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Hit-and-Run Case Due to Lack of Evidence Identifying Driver. Conviction under Sections 279, 304A IPC and Motor Vehicles Act Quashed as Prosecution Failed to Prove Applicant Was Driving the Offending Tempo.

The applicant, Ramnath Yashwant Gholap, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate (First Class), Ashti, for offences under Sections 279 (rash driving) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Erroneous Appreciation of Evidence on Negligence. Compensation of Rs.85,000/- awarded by Tribunal upheld but finding on negligence reversed based on preponderance of probabilities and criminal charge-sheet.

The appellant, Shridhar Anant Prabhu Gaonkar, filed a claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation of Rs.2,00,000 for injur...