Search Results for "property identification"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "property identification"

954 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 954 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Remand Order in Property Dispute — High Court Directed to Decide Appeal on Merits Based on Document Interpretation. The Court held that the High Court's second remand for commissioner identification was unnecessary when the sale deed, conveyance deed, and settlement deed together resolved the survey number discrepancy and established identity of the property.

23 May 2025

The present appeal arises from a property dispute between Peter Augustine (appellant) and K.V. Xavier and others (respondents) concerning 9 cents of l...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court of India: Judgment on Regulation and Approval of Genetically Modified Crops. Ensuring adherence to environmental safety, legal standards, and public health in the approval process for GM crops in India.

23 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court of India concerning various writ petitions filed in public interest related to the regulation and approval of Genetically Modified (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Defreezing of Bank Account in NDPS Case Due to Non-Confirmation of Freezing Order Within 30 Days Under Section 68-F(2) of NDPS Act, 1985. Petitioner's claim as proprietor not barred by earlier statement under Section 67.

27 Feb 2024

The petitioner, Jatinder Kaur Chilotra, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 3 December 202...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Suit for Permanent Injunction Due to Misapplication of Order 7 Rule 3 CPC — Trial Court Erred in Dismissing Suit for Property Description Mismatch Without Considering Evidence of Possession and Title. The High Court held that the courts below misapplied Order 7 Rule 3 CPC as the plaintiff had established purchase and possession of the suit property.

3 Jan 2020

The appellant, original plaintiff, filed a suit for permanent injunction to restrain the defendants from obstructing her cultivating possession over s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute Over Rectification Deed — Upholds Concurrent Findings on Possession and Title. The court held that the plaintiff failed to prove possession and title over the suit property, and the rectification deed did not alter the defendant's prior rights.

30 Jun 2017

The appellant, Shubhangi Ramesh Bhatkar, was the plaintiff in Regular Civil Suit No. 15 of 2006 before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ratnagiri. Sh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Robbery in Auto Rickshaw Snatching Case — Identification by Informant and Recovery of Stolen Articles Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 394 IPC.

24 Apr 2017

The revision petitioner, Mansingh Dhonduram Sakpal, was convicted by the trial Magistrate for the offence punishable under Section 394 read with Secti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Originating Summons for Partition of HUF Property — Plaintiffs Fail to Establish Exclusive Ownership of Mazgaon Property. Court holds that property sold in 2007 was HUF property and proceeds were distributed among all coparceners, including daughters, under Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

27 Feb 2017

The case concerns an Originating Summons filed by Kishore Morarji Bhojraj and Ramesh Morarji Shah (Plaintiffs) against Jaya Hiranchand Karani, Anju Kr...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Dacoity Case Due to Lack of Identification and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Sections 395 and 397 IPC set aside as identification parade was not conducted and recovery of stolen property was not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

23 Sep 2014

The case pertains to an appeal against conviction under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for dacoity and robbery with attempt...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Redevelopment of Acquired Property Under MHADA Based on Settlement Between Owners, Tenants, and Builder. Court Holds That Once Acquisition Notification Lapses, Property Can Be Redeveloped by Private Parties with Consent of All Stakeholders.

28 Nov 2011

The petitioners, comprising owners (Petitioners 1 & 2), tenants (Petitioners 3 to 10), and a builder (Petitioner 11), filed a writ petition challengin...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses State Appeal in Land Title Suit — Upholds Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Against Revenue Authorities. Government Officials Cannot Unilaterally Alter Land Records Without Adjudication of Title Under Specific Relief Act, 1963.

24 Jun 2011

The case involves an appeal by the State of Goa and its officers against a judgment and decree dated 1.4.2005 passed by the Additional District Judge,...

15 16 17 18 19

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)