Search Results for "minor prosecutrix"

381 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 381 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench Considers State Appeal Against Acquittal in Rape and House Trespass Case. The Court Examines Whether Trial Court Erred in Holding Victim Major and Sexual Act Consensual, Despite School Certificate Suggesting Minority.

The State of Karnataka filed an appeal under Section 378(1) and (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the acquittal of the responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age of Victim. Conviction under Sections 354, 363, 342 IPC and Section 8 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim was a child under POCSO Act.

The appellant, Satish s/o Bandu Ragde, was convicted by the Extra Joint Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, in Special Child Protection Case No. 28 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows State Appeal in POCSO Case, Sets Aside Acquittal of Father for Rape of Minor Daughter. Delay in FIR Lodging Held Not Fatal in Child Sexual Abuse Cases Due to Unique Victim-Offender Relationship.

The State of Goa, through the Police Inspector of Canacona Police Station, appealed against the judgment of the Children's Court at Goa which acquitte...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Laboratory Assistant for Rape of Minor Student — Victim's Testimony and Medical Evidence Sufficient. Conviction under Sections 376, 342, 506(2) IPC for Rape of 12-Year-Old in School Laboratory Upheld.

The appellant, Kailash Kisan Memjade, was a Laboratory Assistant at Saint Hildas High School, Pune. On 23 February 2011, he called a 12-year-old stude...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Gang Rape Under Section 376(2)(g) IPC — Reduces Fine for Impecunious Appellant. The court found the prosecutrix's testimony credible and consistent, but reduced the fine from Rs.50,000 to Rs.5,000 due to the appellant's inability to pay.

The case involves an appeal against conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC for gang rape. The prosecutrix was returning home on 21.7.2008 when the two...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Salim Alim Shamsher Shaikh, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, for offences under Sections 376 and 354 IPC...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Tanaji Baburao Phalke, was convicted by the 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for an offence punishable under Section 376 of the Ind...