Search Results for "manufacturer liability"

Trending :

Search Results for "manufacturer liability"

322 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 322 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Madras Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Upholding Setting Aside of Arbitral Award for Perversity. Single Judge Correctly Found That Award Granting Damages for Loss of Business and Non-Supply Ignored Exclusion Clause and Lacked Evidentiary Basis.

14 Mar 2025

The appeal arose from a dispute between a construction and engineering company (appellant) and an elevator manufacturer (first respondent) regarding c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Complainant in Cheque Dishonour Cases, Convicts Accused. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 not rebutted by accused who stopped payment without valid cause, and dispute with third party not a defence.

10 May 2024

The case involves three parties: Hewlett Packard (HP), Kores (India) Ltd. (complainant/appellant), and M/s Ambitious Marketing (accused/respondent). K...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Sales Tax/VAT Cases on Vehicle Hire Contracts, Finding No Transfer of Right to Use Goods. Contracts Where Contractor Retained Control, Maintenance Responsibility, and Risk Do Not Constitute Deemed Sale Under Article 366(29A)(d) of Constitution of India and Assam Tax Acts.

9 Jan 2024

The Supreme Court considered a group of appeals concerning tax liability under the Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993 and Assam Value Added Tax Act, 20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Assessee in Income Tax Case — Write-off of Advances and Expenses Held Allowable as Business Loss Under Section 28 of Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that amounts advanced to a business associate in the course of business dealings and written off as irrecoverable are deductible as business loss.

9 Jun 2023

The appellant, Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd., a public limited company engaged in manufacturing and trading, filed an appeal under Section 206A of the In...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Complaint Against Sleeping Partner in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — No Prima Facie Case as Partner Did Not Sign Cheque or Participate in Business. The court held that a sleeping partner who did not sign the cheque and was not involved in the business cannot be prosecuted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and continuing proceedings would be an abuse of process.

9 Dec 2020

The applicant, Ajay Rampal Sarda, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of Criminal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal on Grounds of Improper Appreciation of Evidence and Reverses Finding of Duress. The Court held that the defence of cheque issued under force was not proved and the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 was not rebutted.

20 Dec 2019

The case involves a criminal appeal filed by the original complainant, Girdharilal Agrawal, against the acquittal of the accused-respondents (State of...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Division Bench Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging the Validity of State Notification Imposing Forest Development Tax on Mining Leases. The Petitioners Seek Declaration that the Notification is Ultra Vires the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and the Constitution.

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification Under Karnataka Forest Act. Petitioners Contended That the Levy on Mineral-Bearing Land Violated Article 246, Entry 54 of Union List, and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

3 Dec 2015

The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by several minin...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Considers Challenge to Levy of VAT on Liquor by Certain Licensees; Alleged Discrimination Between Different Categories of Excise Licence Holders. Petitioners Contend That Notification Exempting Some Dealers While Taxing Others Violates Articles 14, 19, and 304B of the Constitution.

30 Sep 2015

The writ petitions were filed by various licensees under the Karnataka Excise Act, 1967, challenging the constitutional validity of Entry No.59A of th...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Pre-Deposit Condition in Central Excise Remand Order — Condition of Rs.40 Lakhs Deposit Set Aside as Unwarranted. CESTAT Cannot Impose Pre-Deposit Condition While Remanding Matter for De Novo Adjudication Under Central Excise Act, 1944.

26 Feb 2015

The appellant, M/s Dhariwal Industries Limited, a manufacturer of Panmasala and Gutka registered under the Central Excise Act, 1944, was issued a show...

15 16 17 18 19

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)