Search Results for "manifest injustice"

367 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 367 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Sanction and Cognizance in UAPA Case — No Infirmity Found in Sanction Order or Cognizance Order. Court upholds validity of suo-motu sanction under Section 45(2) of UAPA and cognizance order under Section 120B IPC read with UAPA and CLA Act.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Fuleshwar Gope challenging the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which refused to quash the sanctio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Bank's Reauction and Deposit Forfeiture Under SARFAESI Act, 2002. Auction purchaser's failure to pay balance within stipulated time justified forfeiture, with liberty to pursue recovery through independent proceedings.

The appeal arose from a dispute involving auction proceedings under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Secur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail Granted to Accused in Lakhimpur Kheri Violence Case. The Court Held That the High Court Erred in Granting Bail by Overlooking the Gravity of the Offence and the Victim's Right to Be Heard Under Section 2(wa) Cr.P.C.

The Supreme Court set aside the bail granted by the Allahabad High Court to Ashish Mishra @ Monu, the main accused in the Lakhimpur Kheri violence cas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reinstates Bank's Disciplinary Action Against Employee for Negligence in Cash Handling. High Court's Interference with Departmental Inquiry Findings Set Aside as Judicial Review Limited to Procedural Fairness and Perversity Under UCO Bank Regulations.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal challenging the High Court's decision that quashed disciplinary proceedings against a bank employee. The respon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Raman & Raman Ltd. in Stage Carriage Permit Matter, Quashing Appellate Authority's Order. Section 43A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, Holds Only Administrative Power; Directions Issued Are Not Law and Cannot Affect Prior Permits.

The appellant, M/s. Raman & Raman Ltd., was one of several applicants for a stage carriage permit. The Regional Transport Authority granted the permit...