Search Results for "invalid detention order"

324 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 324 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Quashes Detention Order Due to Unexplained Delay in Preventive Detention Case — Live Link Between Grounds and Purpose Snapped. Unexplained delay of 19 days between arrest and detention order renders detention invalid under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Ramani, mother of the detenu Kannan, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the det...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Due to Unexplained Delay Between Arrest and Detention Order. Unexplained Delay of Over One Month Snaps Live and Proximate Link, Rendering Detention Order Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 Invalid.

The petitioner, Rani, mother of the detenu Sidharaj, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the det...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition in Preventive Detention Case Due to Unexplained Delay. Delay of 42 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Snaps Live Link, Rendering Detention Invalid Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Tmt. Valarmathi, mother of the detenu Thiru Jayaprakash, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition in Goonda Detention Case Due to Inordinate Delay — Unexplained Delay of 54 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Snaps Live and Proximate Link Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982.

The petitioner, Kalavathi, sister of the detenu Iyyappan, filed a habeas corpus petition challenging the detention order passed by the Commissioner of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Improper Verification of In-Camera Statements. Failure to Record Subjective Satisfaction on Truthfulness of Secret Witnesses Renders Detention Invalid Under Section 3 of MPDA Act.

The petitioner, Pravin Ganpat Kakad, challenged an order of detention dated 21.08.2020 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Nashik City under Section...