Search Results for "forcible possession"

288 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 288 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Property Tax Reassessment Under Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 — Reassessment Based on Capital Value Method Upheld as Valid Exercise of Statutory Power.

The petitioner, Satguru Corporate Services Pvt. Ltd., filed two writ petitions challenging the reassessment of property tax by the Additional Collecto...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Dispute Due to Failure to Follow Statutory Procedure and Prove Compensation Payment. State Cannot Retain Land Without Valid Acquisition Under Sikkim Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1977.

The case involves a dispute over 7.07 acres of land in East Sikkim that was allegedly acquired by the Agriculture Department of the Government of Sikk...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Companies Act Case — Acquittal Set Aside for Non-Prosecution of Director. Section 452 of Companies Act, 2013 requires that a director must be prosecuted for the company's default; acquittal of director without trial on merits is illegal.

The appellant, M/s. P.M. Granites Exports Pvt. Ltd., filed a complaint under Section 452 of the Companies Act, 2013 against the respondent, T. Manohar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Gang Rape Case — Inconsistent Victim Testimony and Lack of Corroboration Lead to Upholding of Acquittal Under Section 376(2)(g) IPC.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of five respondents (original accused) by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon, in Sessions ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Mesne Profits Claim in Ownership Dispute Over Flat. Court holds that plaintiffs established ownership of suit flat and defendants are liable to pay mesne profits for illegal occupation.

The plaintiffs, Mrs. Tarla N. Morjaria, Mrs. Usha S. Somana, and Mrs. Bharati V. Tanna, filed a suit against the defendants, Mr. Bipin Hiralal Shah an...