Madras High Court Hears Appeal Against Partition Decree in Joint Family Property Suit. Appeal Filed Under Section 96 of CPC Seeks to Set Aside Decree Granting 1/4th Share to Plaintiff in Intestate Succession Case.
6 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "document marked without objection"
581 result(s) found
Found 581 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows IRCTC's Appeals in Catering Contract Dispute, Restricts Interference Under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration Act. Court holds that High Court erred in re-appreciating evidence and substituting its own view over arbitrator's findings on tariff revision.
7 Nov 2025The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Indian Railways Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd. (IRCTC) and other parties, setting aside the Delh...
- 105
High Court
Bombay High Court Directs Compensation for Unauthorized Possession of Land by NHAI — Failure to Acquire Additional Area Despite Taking Possession Violates Article 300A of Constitution. The court held that the respondents cannot retain possession of the additional 8350 sq.mtrs without paying compensation and directed them to pay compensation for use and occupation and to initiate acquisition proceedings under the National Highways Act, 1956.
7 Feb 2025The petitioners, Tushar Laxman Bhakare @ Chawhan and Baby Laxman Bhakare @ Chawhan, are owners of land admeasuring 3 Ha-39 Ares from Gat No.402 situat...
- 2374
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Execution Proceedings — Appellants' Application Under Order 21 Rules 97, 98, 101 CPC Rejected by Executing Court Set Aside. Court Holds That Executing Court Must Determine Rights of Third Parties Claiming Independent Possession Under Order 21 Rule 101 CPC Before Confirming Sale.
19 Sep 2022The present appeal was filed by the appellants, who were the legal heirs of the original judgment-debtor, Hiranappa (since deceased), and other family...
- 82
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petitions Challenging Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Property Dispute. Court holds that appointment of arbitrator by consent of parties is valid and cannot be challenged under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
30 Jul 2015The judgment pertains to two arbitration petitions filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The petitioners in Arbitratio...
- 234
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows KSFC's Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court Order Refusing to Recall Witnesses for Cross-Examination in Suit for Specific Performance. The court held that the defendant's right to cross-examine witnesses cannot be denied when the plaintiff failed to produce them for cross-examination after examination-in-chief, and the trial court's order was erroneous and liable to be set aside.
5 Mar 2015The Karnataka High Court allowed the writ petitions filed by the Karnataka State Financial Corporation (KSFC) and set aside the trial court's order da...
- 36
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses KSFC's Petition for Impleadment in Specific Performance Suit — Mortgagee Not a Necessary Party Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. Section 31E of SFC Act, 1951 Does Not Confer Right to Sue for Specific Performance of Third-Party Contracts.
5 Mar 2015The Karnataka State Financial Corporation (KSFC) filed writ petitions challenging the order of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Mangalore, dated ...
- 37
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Husband's Appeal in Matrimonial Dispute Over Possessory Rights to Shared Household. Wife's Claim for Right to Residence Under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Dismissed as Act Not in Force at Time of Filing.
8 Mar 2013The case involves two appeals filed by the husband challenging a common judgment and order dated 30.12.2004 passed by the Family Court No.4, Mumbai. T...
- 117
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Executing Court's Order in Partition Execution — No Jurisdictional Error Found. Executing Court Cannot Go Behind Decree and Objections Under Order 21 Rule 90 CPC Must Be Raised Before Sale Confirmation.
27 Apr 2006The case arises from a partition suit (Partition Suit No.945 of 1968) filed by the heirs of Bachhusingh, who died intestate on 24-11-1964, concerning ...
- 17
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Amendment Application in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Due Diligence. Amendment to Written Statement Seeking to Introduce Adverse Possession Defence After 22 Years and After Evidence Closed Held to Be Highly Prejudicial and Not Necessary for Determination of Real Controversy Under Order 6 Rule 17 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
30 Nov -0001The judgment arises out of a Chamber Summons filed by the defendant in a pending suit for possession and mesne profits. The plaintiff, Banganga Cooper...
- 83
