Search Results for "daughter's equal share"

353 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 353 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Partially Allows Partition Appeal, Upholds 1/2 Share for Plaintiff but Sets Aside Mesne Profits Award. Co-owner in possession not liable for mesne profits without proof of ouster.

The appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 28.02.2018 in O.S.No.65 of 2009 on the file of the Fast Track Mahila Court, Dindigul. The plaintiff...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Partition Suit. Court Holds That Plaint Cannot Be Rejected Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC When Averments Disclose a Cause of Action, Even If Ancestral Character of Property Is Disputed.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by Mohan Hirachand Shah (defendant no.1) against an order of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Al...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Challenging Wakf Board Notification Including Service Inam Lands in Dargah Property. Errata Notification Adding Lands to Wakf Property Upheld as Valid Exercise of Power Under Wakf Act, 1995.

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of civil appeals challenging an order of the Andhra Pradesh High Court that upheld an Errata Notification issued b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition to Implead Daughter in Final Decree Proceedings Under Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC — Amendment to Section 6 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Confers Coparcenary Rights on Daughters Born Before 2005

The petitioner, Smt. Honamma, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 4.6.2014 passed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals in Property Declaration Suit — Upholds Trial Court Decree Based on Adverse Possession and Valid Title. Concurrent findings of fact regarding possession and title cannot be disturbed in appeal without substantial error.

The case involves two Regular First Appeals (RFA No.429/2003 and RFA No.506/2003) filed against the judgment and decree dated 13.1.2003 passed by the ...