Search Results for "dangerous activities"

759 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 759 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Dangerous Person Due to Lack of Material on Public Order Disturbance. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere FIRs do not justify preventive detention without evidence of threat to public order.

The petitioner, Aakib @ Gani Ganibhai Belim, was preventively detained by an order dated 29/01/2026 passed by the Police Commissioner, Ahmedabad, unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Dangerous Person Due to Lack of Material on Public Order Disturbance. Detention under Section 2(c) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not constitute disturbance to public order.

The petitioner, Karansinh Punamsinh Parmar (detenue), challenged the legality and validity of a preventive detention order dated 08.01.2026 passed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Procedural Lapses Petitioner Challenges Preventive Detention Based on Arms Act Offences and In-camera Statements -- Court Finds Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Violation of Article 22 Safeguards

The petitioner filed a criminal writ petition challenging a detention order under the MPDA Act, which directed his detention for 12 months on grounds ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act Due to Insufficient Impact on Public Order. Detention Based on Five Criminal Cases Under Section 304(2) BNS Found Inadequate to Establish Prejudice to Public Order Under Section 2(c) of the Act.

The case involved a petition challenging a preventive detention order passed under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985. The det...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act Due to Insufficient Material. Detention Authority Failed to Demonstrate How Alleged Activities Affected Public Order as Required Under Section 2(c) of the Act, Making Subjective Satisfaction Illegal.

The case involved a petition challenging a preventive detention order passed under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985. The det...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Detenu in Judicial Custody — Failure to Show Imminent Possibility of Bail Renders Order Invalid. Preventive detention cannot be sustained when detenu is already in custody and no cogent material exists to indicate likely release on bail.

The petitioner, father of the detenu Jaidev @ Rajubhai @ J.D. Ramji Mishra, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution chall...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Under M.P.A.D. Act Due to Inordinate Delay in Considering Representation. Detenu's Right to Speedy Consideration of Representation Under Article 22(5) Violated, Detention Order Quashed.

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Mohammed Iqbal @ Shembdya Iqbal @ Iqbal Jogeshwari Mohammed Hussain Mandal, filed a writ petition under Article 226...