Search Results for "contradictory certificates"

Trending :

Search Results for "contradictory certificates"

202 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 202 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows IRCTC's Appeals in Catering Contract Dispute, Restricts Interference Under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration Act. Court holds that High Court erred in re-appreciating evidence and substituting its own view over arbitrator's findings on tariff revision.

7 Nov 2025

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Indian Railways Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd. (IRCTC) and other parties, setting aside the Delh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Letters of Administration with Will Annexed in Testamentary Suit — Will Proved to be Last and Validly Executed Despite Allegations of Suspicious Circumstances and Undue Influence. The court held that the propounder removed all suspicions by proving due execution and testamentary capacity under Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.

14 Oct 2016

The plaintiff, Panna Surendra Mehta, sister-in-law of the deceased Jaswantbhai Natwarlal Jolia, sought Letters of Administration with Will Annexed to ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC set aside as sole dying declaration was not recorded in proper question-answer form and lacked corroboration.

22 Dec 2015

The appellants, four individuals, were convicted by the 3rd Ad-Hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai, for the murder of Mohammad Rafiq under Section 3...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title and Possession.

29 Oct 2015

The case involves a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, arising from a suit for declaration of ownership and injunct...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Co-owner Property Dispute — Holds That Possession of Co-owner Is Not Adverse Without Ouster. The court ruled that the burden of proving ouster lies on the party claiming adverse possession, and the suit for declaration and possession was within limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

29 Oct 2015

The case involves a property dispute among co-owners. The appellants (original plaintiffs) filed a suit for declaration of title and possession of agr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Evidence and Inconsistent Witness Testimony. Common Cart-way Dispute Leads to Fatal Assault but Prosecution Fails to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC.

26 Jun 2015

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of three respondents (Satlinga Mahalinga Ketkale, Anil Satlinga Ketkale, and Sangappa Satlinga...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Financial Institution in Suit for Recovery of Money Due to Failure to Prove Loan Agreement and Liability of Promoters. Equity Participation by Appellant Did Not Create a Debtor-Creditor Relationship with Respondents.

6 Apr 2015

The appellant, EDC Limited, a financial institution, filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 17,50,000/- with interest against the respondents, M/s. GKB Opht...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Tender Rejection in Mid-Day Meal Scheme — No Right to Claim Contract Beyond Tender Conditions. Petitioner failed to comply with mandatory e-tender requirements and could not claim estoppel against government in contractual matters.

22 Aug 2014

The petitioner, Sahyadri Madhyawarti Sahakari Grahak Sangh Maryadit, a cooperative society, filed a writ petition challenging the rejection of its ten...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Employer's Liability for Driver's Injury Upheld Despite Insurance Policy in Previous Owner's Name. The court held that negligence of the workman is not a defence under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, and the employer is liable to pay compensation for injuries sustained during employment.

14 Feb 2014

The appellant, Tarachand Shrawanji Shambharkar, was a truck driver employed by respondent No.1, Prashant Ramchandra Hiranwar. On 29th June, 1997, whil...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Probate Petition in Testamentary Suit No. 13 of 1994 — Will Not Proved Due to Suspicious Circumstances. Propounders Failed to Discharge Burden of Proving Due Execution Under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

13 Aug 2013

The plaintiffs, Harish Vithal Kulkarni and Shivanand Vishwanath Warty, claiming to be executors under a Will dated 11th October, 1991 of Mahadeo Sabni...

15 16 17 18 19

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)