Search Results for "constituent"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "constituent"

413 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 413 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in PC Act Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration — Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

24 Nov 2025

The State of Maharashtra, through the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Anti-Corruption Bureau, Chandrapur, filed an appeal against the judgment and or...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

24 Nov 2025

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 07.12.2011 passed by the learned Special Judge, Warora in Special (ACB) Case No...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Share Broker Dispute — MOU Default Renders Agreement Void and Claimant Entitled to Recover Full Amount. The court upheld the arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy.

24 Mar 2015

The petitioner, a share and stock broker and member of the Bombay Stock Exchange, was the original respondent in arbitration proceedings initiated by ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Commodity Brokerage Dispute — Failure to Object to Contract Notes Renders Oral Claims Unsupported. The Court held that a client who receives and does not object to timely contract notes for commodity derivatives transactions cannot later claim those transactions were unauthorized, and an arbitral award based solely on oral submissions ignoring such documentary evidence is liable to be set aside under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

5 Dec 2014

The Petitioner, M/s. Nirmal Bang Commodities Pvt. Ltd., a broker registered under the Companies Act, 1956, challenged an arbitral award dated 27 Febru...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition Challenging Award Rejecting Claim for Unauthorised Transactions in Stock Broker Account. Court upholds arbitral finding that claim was barred by limitation and lacked merit due to acknowledgments of contract notes.

26 Jun 2014

The petitioner, a constituent of the respondent stock broker, filed an arbitration petition challenging an award dated 7th January 2011 that rejected ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Claim of Retired Professor in WRIC Case — University and UGC Directed to Pay Pension Under University Pension Scheme. The court held that the petitioner, a former director of WRIC, was entitled to pension benefits as WRIC was a constituent unit of the University of Mumbai, which had adopted a pension scheme.

20 Mar 2014

The petitioner, Dr. Arvind Vishnu Patankar, a Ph.D. in Solid State Physics, joined Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (TIFR) as a Research Assista...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of MRTP Act Provisions. Court holds that Sections 49(7) and 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 are constitutionally valid and not ultra vires Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21, 21A, 47 and 243(w).

29 Jan 2014

The petitioners, Chalisgaon Municipal Council and a resident, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the constitution...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Stock Exchange Dispute — Limitation Period Under Bye-law 252(2) Starts from Date of Last Transaction, Not Subsequent Meetings. Claim for Rs. 78.63 lakhs arising from debit of Rs. 1.17 crores on 12 February 2008 held barred by limitation as claim was not filed within six months of last transaction.

25 Sep 2013

The appeal arose from a judgment of a learned Single Judge dated 1 October 2012 dismissing a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Concilia...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Share Transaction Dispute — Limitation Period Governed by Limitation Act, 1963 Pursuant to SEBI Circulars. The court held that SEBI circulars override stock exchange byelaws, and the claim filed within three years under the Limitation Act was not barred.

24 Jul 2013

The appeal arose from a judgment of a learned Single Judge dismissing a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Stock Exchange Dispute — No Violation of Right to Legal Representation Found. The court held that the appellant failed to demonstrate any denial of opportunity to engage a lawyer before the Appellate Arbitral Tribunal under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

1 Feb 2005

The case involves an appeal against an order of a Single Judge dismissing a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, t...

15 16 17 18 19

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)