Search Results for "advance refund"

653 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 653 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance Due to Non-Compliance with Order VI Rule 17 CPC and Lack of Pleading Readiness and Willingness. Plaintiff failed to amend plaint to incorporate essential facts regarding readiness and willingness to perform contract, leading to dismissal of suit.

The plaintiff, Neeta Sawant, filed a suit for specific performance of an Agreement for Sale dated 30th September 2016, by which the defendants agreed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Appellant failed to establish that the loan of Rs.3,00,000 was legally recoverable debt under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant, Arti Rajesh Karangutkar, filed a criminal appeal against the acquittal of respondent No.1, Anna Rocky Fernandes, by the Metropolitan Ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice in Customs Case Due to 24-Year Delay in Adjudication. Inordinate delay in adjudication of show cause notice under Section 28 of Customs Act, 1962 renders it stale and liable to be quashed as abuse of process.

The petitioners, Rachana Garments Pvt. Ltd. and its director Dinesh Kumar Bhartiya, challenged a show cause notice dated 27 June 1997 issued by the Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Appoints Arbitrators in Brewing Agreement Dispute Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Failure of Appointed Arbitrator to Constitute Tribunal Justifies Court Intervention.

The petitioner, Anheuser Busch InBev India Limited, filed a Civil Miscellaneous Petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Cash Credit Case — Upholds Addition Under Section 68 Despite Rejection of Books for Gross Profit. Books of Account Can Be Partially Relied Upon for Different Additions Even After Rejection Under Section 145(3) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appeal arose from a challenge to an addition of Rs.2,26,000 made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as unexplained cash credits. The ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Agreement of Sale Proved by Attesting Witness and Part Performance Established, No Substantial Question of Law Arises Under Section 100 CPC.

The appellant, Muktumhussain Mehaboob Sab Bapunavar, was the fourth defendant in a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale filed by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore Hears Appeals by Telecom Companies Against Income Tax Department on TDS Liability. Multiple Appeals Filed Under Section 260-A of Income Tax Act, 1961 Challenging ITAT Orders for Assessment Years 2005-06 to 2008-09.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore heard a batch of Income Tax Appeals filed by telecom companies under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 196...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Telecom Companies' Appeals on Section 194H TDS Liability Against Distributors. Discounts to Channel Partners Held as Commission, Mandating Tax Deduction Under Agency Relationship.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of appeals by telecom companies challenging Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders confirming their liability ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Telecom Companies' Appeals, Upholding Tax Deduction at Source Under Section 194H on Discounts to Distributors. Relationship Between Telecom Companies and Distributors Held to Be Principal-Agent, Making Discounts Liable as Commission for Tax Deduction Purposes.

Multiple telecom companies, including Bharti Airtel Limited, Vodafone Essar South Limited, and Tata Teleservices Limited, filed appeals under Section ...